How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask John Your Own Question
John, Employment Lawyer
Category: Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 4451
Experience:  Exclusively practice labor and employment law.
Type Your Employment Law Question Here...
John is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I have a contract with with a non-compete in one of the pages.

This answer was rated:

I have a contract with with a non-compete in one of the pages. This particular page of the contract I did not sign or send in with the other pages.

Here we are now, after the project is completed. The mutual customer has extended additional work- however the middle man between the client and myself does not want to meet the customers bill rate. Having forwarded the request to them fir first right of refusal, am I free to bid and take this project given they are unwilling to?

Again we have an agreement that was executed and paid against- in that the non-solicitation page was never signed or forwarded by me. The other portions of the agreement were.

I am more than happy to contract for billable hours for this consult- given my time sensitive nature I need to get back to the client tomorrow. This kinda all came to a head today.
Hi, My name is XXXXX XXXXX I’m happy to assist you with your question today.

This is a factually specific matter in that you didn't sign the non-solicit agreement, but the contractor apparently sent you a non-solicit expecting that it was part of the "deal" between you two.

To be sure, non-solicits between contractor/subcontractor are enforceable under Oregon law, and the fact that the contractor has not yet or will not get more business from the customer doesn't necessarily give the subcontractor a right to solicit the unwanted business.

So you are left with what lawyers call "issues of fact" in this matter - does your agreement with the contractor include the non-solicitation even though you didn't sign it as an implied term of the contract. And, second, if it does have an implied non-solicitation, would your attaining a client that the contractor couldn't/wouldn't offer additional services at a specific price be barred by the non-solicit. These questions would go to a trier of fact (a jury usually) if the contractor sued you in the matter. And the problem with that is you'd have to go through an entire lawsuit (about 1.5 years of litigation) before you get to the point of putting these questions in front of a jury.

You were probably seeking yes or no answers on these specific issues. But there simply isn't a clear definite answer in the caselaw, and because there is no clear answer in the caselaw, you'd have to take the matter so far in litigation, you'd probably lose all the money you gained in attaining the client in the first place. The botXXXXX XXXXXne being here - the case isn't so clearly a winner for you that you can take the job with the confidence that you will not get sued and, if you do get sued, the lawsuit will last quite some time and cost quite a bit - even if you win.

My best thoughts for you on handling this are this 1) the more aggressive approach - accept the offer from customer, then if contractor demands you cease and desist - do so; or 2) the conservative approach - tell the customer you cannot do the work at this time - maybe some time in the future when it has not used contractor for a fairly long time, you can do further work for customer.

I believe this answers your question. However, if you need clarification or have follow-up questions regarding this matter, I will be happy to continue our conversation – simply reply to this answer. If you are otherwise satisfied with my response, please leave a positive rating as it is the only way I am able to get credit for my answers. Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX wish you all the best with this matter.

Customer: replied 2 years ago.

Thank you for the quick response John.


It seems like a lose lose situation. If I am looking @ simply a cease a desist action I would be inclined to take that approach. However without knowing what the contractor may or may not do( what would be considered reasonable action ) were they to take exception to my working with the customer its fairly difficult to make a decision here.


Is cease and desist the likely and reasonable response to this situation?


At the very least I'd have to believe the contractor sends you a cease and desist letter upon learning you took a bid from the customer. The next most probable is that they file a lawsuit to attempt to get an immediate injunction against you working for the customer. Such lawsuits are fairly expensive though, so from their perspective the customer revenue would have to be in excess of around $20,000 to get going on a lawsuit. Then again, I suppose there's a small chance they never learn you took the position. So this does involve to some measure of guessing what they'd do. Most important - this is not a risk free transaction absent your plainly rejecting the position.

Hope this helps. Let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

Thanks again John,


I don't want to go around them and I forwarded them the engagement first. -However it seems as though I am @ an impasse as they simply have not held together the relationship with the customer.


Thanks again John.


Is there a means to get you on retainer? I am assuming regardless of where you are practicing from - Oregon follows the UCC like everyone else. So your services moving forward would be worth the expense.



You're welcome Joe.

The website unfortunately does not allow us to individually represent clients. What you can do however if forward any future questions on the matter to me at

Or you can simply submit new questions and note in the question "for John only" or "for emplmntlaw1 only"

Thanks, XXXXX XXXXX your business. Please leave a positive rating before you exit this chat as it is the only way I get credit for my answers.

John, Employment Lawyer
Category: Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 4451
Experience: Exclusively practice labor and employment law.
John and 2 other Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • I must thank you all for such a positive and knowledgeable Expert in your Employment Law category. She has provided much relief and answers for me in the midst of dealing with a case. I am totally pleased with her customer service and care. Mildred Washington, DC
< Previous | Next >
  • I must thank you all for such a positive and knowledgeable Expert in your Employment Law category. She has provided much relief and answers for me in the midst of dealing with a case. I am totally pleased with her customer service and care. Mildred Washington, DC
  • Excellent direction from Socrateaser to help me preserve and pursue my rights as a proud American who has become unemployed in this messed-up economic downfall. Thank you Happy Customer Denver, CO
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA

Meet The Experts:

  • Tina



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, BBA, recognized by ABA for excellence.
< Last | Next >
  • Tina's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, BBA, recognized by ABA for excellence.
  • Allen M., Esq.'s Avatar

    Allen M., Esq.

    Employment Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    Employment/Labor Law Litigation
  • Marsha411JD's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed Attorney with 29 yrs. exp in Employment Law
  • Infolawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed attorney helping employers and employees.
  • JB Umphrey's Avatar

    JB Umphrey


    Satisfied Customers:

    Assisting employees and employers for over 14 years.
  • Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    I provide employment and discrimination law advice in my own practice.
  • John's Avatar


    Employment Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    Exclusively practice labor and employment law.

Related Employment Law Questions