I hope this message finds you well, present circumstances excluded. NCA are enforceable as long as they are reasonable. They must be for reasonable amounts of time and within reasonable geographic limitations. Moreover, increasingly, it appears that when an individual is in a situation such as the one you are in wherein the business is on the verge of collapse, courts are unwilling to enforce the provisions of a non-compete as strictly.
Since you are not carrying with you proprietary information that is protected under intellectual property laws (I assume there is no patent or copyright on the design or process), then you should be fine in accepting the job and moving, even in view of the non-compete.
The fact that you are moving from the state certainly helps your cause.
While more of a personal decision than legal, you may want to let the new employer know about the NCA so they are not caught off guard if by some chance the current employer tries to make a stink about the issue. The reason I say this is a personal decision is that you know the people and how they would react. If they want your services, they will not be overly concerned about the NCA as it is likely unenforceable anyway.
To that point, if the current employer is struggling so bad right now, it is unlikely they are going to want to expend the legal fees to fight out the NCA anyway. More times than not, the NCA is a bluff.
In summary, based on the information you have provided, it is very likely that you will be perfectly fine taking the new job. NCA are enforceable based on reasonableness. Reasonableness takes into account geographic area and time. Since you are moving to another state and since the current employer is struggling, the law would indicate you will be fine.
Let me know if you have any additional questions or comments.
Best wishes going forward.
Here is a copy of the NCA clause, just in case. I don't think it would change anything, to me it's kind of vague. Especially since they never even signed it... Hopefully your answer stays pretty much the same after reading it.
Dan, that does not change anything. It is too vague, too broad, places no limitations on geography and only last for one year. Moreover, the fact that it only restricts, in essence, knowledge acquired on the job, bolsters your case even more. You had this knowledge and taught it to them...it was not acquired as a result of access to their R&D. The fact that they did not sign it is somewhat ancillary to the fact but certainly a feather in your cap and an additional argument to be made if it came down to it as well.
You should be in the clear based on the language of that document and predicated on what you have told me.
Let me know if you need anything else.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).