Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.This is a bit of a tough situation, and I am genuinely sorry to hear that you are exposed to such backlash. Under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-2.5(a), an employer CAN take into consideration your criminal record but only if it 'rationally relates' to your position. In other words, if your conviction has nothing to do with your work, the employer cannot use it against you. Instead, that would indeed make you a protected class and could permit you to pursue them for violating your rights under state law. You are not quite a protected class, the employer simply is given some leeway, but at the same time you would be protected to some extent if your conviction is not related to your position. As for resignation, I agree that resigning creates an argument that you would not be entitled to benefits. That can be bypassed however--you can get the employer to agree, in writing, to NOT contest your unemployment benefits if you resign. If they agree to sign such an agreement, it would likewise be binding so if you do resign you would be able to seek benefits from the state.Good luck.
Thank you so much for your feedback! I'm thinking my conviction may 'rationally relate'. Who would make that determination? In my mind it could possibly 'rationally relate' in that I was a teacher at the time of my conviction and my offense was with a minor.
Currently I am the director of student services for the college I work at. Although these students are no longer minors, would that still have a 'rational related' connection?
Would it be best to write my letter of resignation with what you stipulated about them not contesting my unemployment benefits if I resign?
Mahalo, Jae.Hmm, if you work with 'minors' in any capacity, specifically that college has individuals under 18 who enter, then your conviction may rationally relate since you would then have potential contact with minors and then the college could be concerned, rightly or not, that there could be an incident. Plus, from their perspective, they now have additional liability since they are aware that you have such a history and do have some contact with individuals who are under the age of majority. In that sense they could utilize that as a basis and I would suspect they could get away with termination by making such an argument against you. Now, if nobody there is a minor then there is no rational relation to your position.If the former is the situation then resigning but with stipulations may be wiser.Hope that helps.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).