I was demoted two days (on a Friday) after the denial, I was terminated three weeks later while on FMLA. I would be willing to pay contingency, but not a third. I would rather pay hourly, as I feel the case could not be stronger. My title shouldn't even be an issue, as the statute protects my essential duties and work environment, right? I am not seeing a cogent defense by the company here, other than the weak pretext of "a reduction in force", which falls apart when you consider that my colleague and I were the only ones in our dept. "reduced". In short, the demotion is the FLSA issue vs. the termination, which was a reaction to my FMLA leave. The meeting was called two days after I went on FMLA, and scheduled for the day before I was to return. Obviously, they decided while I was on FMLA to go with a pretext of a reduction in force...yet everyone else who was "let go" is still working there permanently. I see them every Thursday night for chicken wings. ;)
Thank you for your follow-up, Kevin. You asked a very detailed question. If I miss anything, please follow-up, it was not by intent.You posted: 1. What should I be entitled to? My yearly with OT (I have all the records) was about 270k. I also lost 100k shares of private stock options, was humiliated in a public demotion with no warning, and demoted again in a (recorded) face to face. I was terminated `while on FMLA leave, ostensibly as a "reduction in force", but the only reduction was me and someone else closely involved. I was forced to participate in several weeks of a sham investigation, led by one of the ringleaders. I lost almost 6 years of effort and flawless performance records. I lost an additional 10% quarterly bonus, accrued PTO and seniority. I have had panic attacks, constant pain from two teeth I was getting fixed before I lost my income and insurance. My girlfriend was so stressed, she miscarried the baby we had been trying to have for a year in the third month of her pregnancy. The company is now telling my future employers that "He was never the manager, he is lying on his resume", so that is certainly making life difficult. If you were me, what number would you start at? In my field, I will be lucky to be in the spot I was ever again. We're talking about a 5 billion dollar company with about 500 employees.The short answer is that you are entitled (if you prevail) of you base salary of up to 2 years, and all additional bonuses or expected earnings that you lost due to the termination. Here is where the courts may balk at overtime but if you can show by past stubs that the OT was regular and expected, and the earnings were expected, the courts tend to permit it. You can also potentially ask for attorney fees and punitive damages. Punitive damages are granted by the judge at his discretion and can be unlimited, although they tend to be no more than 3 times the salary limit. Punitive damages are granted where conduct is particularly egregious. Employment law claims are simply not as lucrative as people consider them to be. 2. Does the only other gentleman let go (for not signing the backdated and inexplicable form) have any recourse standing behind me in a collective action? He had invoked his FLSA rights just weeks before and was punished for it. You do not have enough for a collective action. For a class action you need more than two, and having you both sue together ends up lowering your mutual limits. It would be wiser to pursue separate claims.3. What are my options when it comes to separately suing the bad actors here, namely the Chief of Staff and Director? Would it all have to be together? These people knew EXACTLY what they were doing, that it was illegal, and didn't lose a wink of sleep. You can add them as co-defendants when suing the company. You could also consider filing a defamation of character claim against them as well.4. Is the termination while on FMLA a seperate case? I was let go when members of (my) team who had been WRITTEN UP were retained. There is no controversy that out of the 18 members, I was most senior AND most technically adept. 3 weeks before, I had received a 200% bonus when other peers in my bonus program were all given 125%. 1 week before, I have the same director who demoted me, RECCOMMENDING ME FOR A RAISE. I also have several witnesses to a conversation that day, where he said "If they don't give you this raise I am submitting you for, I have doubts about my own future with this company. You deserve it, without a doubt". If anyone in that group was promoted, and now 4 of them have been, I would have been the OBVIOUS choice. The "reduction in force" was pretext to send a clear message to the rest of staff. It worked...those who didn't leave now put up with whatever shady business these guys put out there. FMLA is an another violation, and it is also based on retaliation and wrongful termination since it gives you a right to claim both FMLA (discrimination), retaliation, but also arguably whistleblowing. The 'reduction in force' is wrongful termination and likewise retaliation.5. I have interviewed 4 law firms, all of whom are interested in taking the case. I let go of my initial lawyer, as I didn't feel she was devoting enough attention to the matter. She inadvertantly copied the Director on 2 email chains that were private between us. The other 3 only want to take the case on contingency, but I feel that they would be walking with too much $. 400k in fees if I win and a THIRD of the settlement...frankly, I deserve that settlement since this should be in the bag, I have amassed SO MUCH EVIDENCE of everything, and have the demotion recorded. This seems to me to be a "slam dunk", if such a thing exists. I want someone who will either negotiate the % of the settlement, work hourly, or work with me on a hybrid % and hourly. I know they see dollar signs, but seriously...how much easier could it be? Are lawyers generally open to negotiate this?You are likely not going to like my response here but it would be remiss of me not to say it. Generally you get what you pay for with attorneys. Those on contingency tend to be hungrier and willing to go for a larger settlement. You can absolutely negotiate or offer different fee structures, but being a law firm is a business that has expenses. I am not advocating contingency or flat fee or a hybrid, merely stating that if an attorney does not see a good payoff, he won't take your case. Sometimes those with dollar signs are the best...but never think that because it looks easy that it is easy. Employment cases are very tough to win, even in ideal circumstances. If you offer flat fee, you can do so, but then prepare for a very large up-front retainer. 6. Any advice? I feel a tad overwhelmed fighting a company with billions to throw around, though I feel I have an airtight, albeit complicated, case.I cannot offer you advice, I am sorry about that--I am not your attorney. But I can suggest that you speak with a few attorneys and listen to what they say about their theory of the case--ask them about the weaknesses and ask them about what they realistically see as an outcome. Those that try to sell you, well, that would be their loss, but the ones that tell you the truth as they see it, even if you do not agree, they may be worth hiring. Right now you think you have a case but you have nothing tangible--you merely have a potential payout. That is the better way to approach it.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).