Employment Law Questions? Ask an Employment Lawyer.
I am not sure if there was discrimination at play in this case. I know that it was past animosity between older management and newer one that was the root cause. As I played an important role for the past management, new management did not like me.
There were lay offs in the month of March and I am aware of bunch of employees who were let go with 6 mo/9 mo packages. I was told that my role is not existing any more but I was not laid off at that time. Later, they did it in the worst possible way because they wanted to retaliate against me due to my past role and later my decision to not play with them and blow the whistle instead.
Whatever the reason my questions are still outstanding. Aren't they?
Well, I needed to have my questions answered, because they frame the answers to your questions.Without a contract of employment, you are an "at will" employee. That means that you can legally be terminated without cause or warning. To overcome that rule, you have to be able to claim some sort of illegal discrimination for the termination to actually be unlawful.So, when you say that you have been unlawfully terminated, I have to explore what you could mean by that. If you were not an employee with a contract stating that you could only be terminated for cause AND you can't allege discrimination based on race, religion, gender, age, disability or FMLA use, then you were not actually wrongfully terminated (at least by legal standards).To address your specific questions:Can the new management over-turn a written review for the whole 2012 in just 30 days?Yes, they can change it. Personnel files are the property of the employer. Because the information contained therein is just for their company use, it is not considered defamation of character for it to contain inaccuracies. Essentially, they are allowed to lie to themselves. If they broadcast the lies to third parties, such as prospective employers that you try to get a job with, they then engage in defamation of character.Did HR played its role correctly? Should they have disclosed to me that they are not neutral players in this case?HR works for the company, so their role is to protect the company from suit. Many think that HR works for the employees, but that's just not true. Often HR's goals will coincide with the employee's goals and that's a good situation, but that is not any sort o legal requirement. HR is not neutral, but they have no legal obligation to say they are not neutral. Instead, they have a legal obligation to refrain from saying that they are neutral. They just can't tell you "I work for you, so everything you say to me is confidential." Given that I have sufficient proofs to prove my above statements is there a law against such practices?I addressed this, I believe, in my other two responses. Minnesota law only grants you the right to review personnel files, not to adjust them. The employer has a property right in them and until they broadcast false information to third parties, there is no legal action to take. HR did it's job and broke no laws, at least based on the facts that you gave. While I don't appreciate the way HR often behaves, they have a pro-employer position, always, in every employment situation. Just on those facts, I do not see a wrongful termination claim. I really do wish that I could say differently here, but I don't deal in false hope. I'm simply respecting you enough to be honest with you about the law in this situation.Take care.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).