Employment Lawyers Can Answer Your Employment Law Questions
Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you directly with your concerns.To answer directly, please allow me to go statement by statement and respond to your concerns. 1- we are like a country club and if you don't belong to the club you don't succeed.Unless he is insinuating that you are not part of the club because you are not white,it is not discriminatory. Being part of a 'club' does not necessarily have a racist element, it may simply be a means of stating whether or not you are a member of the collective and the group or not, without it being related to you being Hispanic. Purely as a comment it does not inherently appear discriminatory. 2- XY person (former employee) was only working here because she was a minority. That potentially is discriminatory. It may not be discriminatory to you, but this is a direct example of a potential hostile work environment.3- sometimes people wearing too much makeup are not able to succeed.Not discriminatory. Wearing makeup is not a protected factor, and the comment also happens to be true. Unless it was being said because you are a woman, it is tough to claim this has discriminatory intent. 4- people who are not liked don't get promoted. Not discriminatory at all, and likewise true. Since employers have the right to promote as they see fit, they do tend to promote those they like personally over those that they do not get along with, and that is also not discriminatory.5-I'm not apt to speak to c-suite level employees within a particular client. That is a business decision. Without more facts it is hard to claim this is discriminatory-it may have been at the request of the client, for example.6- people are afraid of what I might say (note that my technical ability is excellent and never been questioned) in front of clients.Also not discriminatory. This is not based on your gender or race but arguably your professionalism. So that is not likely discriminatory.Hope that helps.
I reported the potential harrassment but they never asked me to put it in writing, why?
Thank you for your follow-up.My suspicion is that they did not want to create a paper trail and wanted to smooth this out so as if it did not exist. But I am only guessing. You still have the right to contact the EEOC and file a grievance with them directly.Good luck.
The harrassing behaviour is still going on, should I go to HR again and have them put in writing or should I just go to EEOC?
Before you escalate it outside the company you have to show that you attempted to resolve it in 'good faith' within the company. As a consequence, and so as to have a better chance to prevail should you need to escalate, you have to give the company itself the opportunity to get this resolved and only if they fail contact the EEOC. It, likewise, allows you to create your own paper trail and strengthen your own position pertaining to your allegations about this behavior.Good luck.
Thanks, XXXXX XXXXX should ask them to put the complaint in writing this time, right?
You are most welcome!Correct, you need this in writing so as to create your own paper trail. Good luck!
If I had an incident a couple of years go within the same company, I was working on a different department, where i complaint that my co0workers did not invite me to an event and kept me out of the loop, does that hurt my chances,? It was never reported to HR or anything.
Thank you for your follow-up.That does not hurt anything but it also does not help anything. For EEOC purposes there is a 180 day statute of limitations--if an event takes place and HR does not resolve it, you have 180 days from the date of incident to report it. So if something occurred a few years ago, it is too far back at this time to really pursue in any meaningful way.Good luck.
Ok but can they use it as character assassination, like I have a history of paranoia?
No, not really. It is really not related to this event, especially since each claim has to be independently evaluated and review. So even if you arguably cried wolf in the past (or so they claim), that does not mean that this was that time. That type of evidence is not really a claim because it does not validate either position, it simply shows that the initial complaint was never pursued.Good luck.
Today, there was another incident where my boss was interrupting me on a client meeting and talking over me. I've been in the business13 years and handled those type of calls all the time as well as in-person meetings.
This is the type of harrassing behaviour, aside from referencing former minority employesss that I'm reffering to. My colleagues do not get treated this way.
I will go to HR tomorrow to report this incident and make certain I put it in writing. What I might do is send an -email to HR stating, I want to discuss an incident as a follow up to our discussion Monday about my complaint regarding Discrimination/Harrassment due to National Origin.
What do you think?
Thank you for your follow-up.That makes sense, it creates a history that this isn't a first attempt to resolve and that you have attempted to get HR to assist you in the past.Good luck.
Then, you feel that the incident above merits me reporting it right?
To be honest I do not see a boss talking over an underling to be harassory. I do consider it rude and unprofessional, but there is nothing in your facts that makes it appear that it was done due to discrimination. When a person is rude or a jerk, that is not against the law.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).