Thank you for your question today, I look forward to assisting you. I bring nearly 20 years of legal experience in various disciplines.
Does the contract state that you can only be terminated for cause?
Does the contract have any sort of termination provisions at all?
Does the contract state that the terms can't be altered without your consent?
You'd have to post it in this forum. I can't give you my email, by the rules of this cite.
I'd like to see it, because your answers are very confusing. I'm not sure this is a contract of employment at all, as it seems to be missing many important provisions of a contract of employment.
No. The rules of this site do not allow us to communicate outside of this forum. That is why I can't give you my email address in order to send me the contract.
If the contract is supposed to last three years, I just have a really difficult time believing that there is not any provision at all for the company to be able to terminate it.
A true contract would at least allow them to terminate you for cause. The document that you are describing right now suggests that you could essentially do anything that you wanted in the workplace, but as long as you did your work, they couldn't fire you and that simply can't be true.
How long is this document? How many paragraphs does it have? Did both parties have to sign it?
If the contract really does not contain any provision whatsoever for them to terminate you, then yes you can use the contract to maintain the terms of your employment through the 3 year period involved.
I'm certainly not suggesting that you are lying about the contents...I'm just shocked that such a contract would be written. It goes against my lawyerly sensibilities which always require a safety valve.
It is a term of years contract, and without an early termination provision, they would have to establish some serious cause amounting to a breach on your part in order to get out of its provisions.
No, I saw no text of any kind. I only saw your last statement:
"Prior to this contract I had submitted my resignation. This contact was initiated by the CEO to keep me from leaving the company. "
So, this appears to be an email or letter from someone.
Neither of you signed this, did you? There was no formal, written contract upon which both parties placed their signatures?
That's not an employment contract. Not a true one. It is an attempt by a non-lawyer to draft something up, but it meets none of the normal requirements for an employment contract, which specifically requires something to be said about termination. It has to state that termination of the agreement can only happen for cause or it is essentially nothing more than a statement of terms for "at will" employment.
I'm getting unnecessarily bogged down on this point perhaps, but a court is not going to enforce that contract as a true term of years employment contract because entirely too much is missing from it to be truly enforceable in that way.
I'm not saying that you have no arguments to make here, but that is not an "employment contract" as we term them.
Your arguments would be equitable in nature, not contractual. You would be able to argue, based on these agreement, that you reasonably relied on their promise to your detriment, in that you chose to stay rather than leaving for other work, based on the promises of the company. You, therefore, lost opportunities you would otherwise have taken. That is also your argument if they terminate the agreement, which they can certainly try to do, claiming that it is merely an "at will" agreement.
The issue of termination is important, because it discloses what kind of contract you actually have. I know they aren't trying to terminate you, but if you have a contract which doesn't stop them from terminating you, then they can literally terminate your employment and then immediately offer you new employment at the rates they want.
Just because is says the words "Employment contract" on it does not mean that it meets the legal requirements of a contract. I can understand you having a hard time believing this, but I make a living interpreting and drafting these things. It's all I do. I'd love to be able to tell you that you have an ironclad employment contract here. I would if I could. It'd make you happy and you'd be more likely to pay me. And yet, I'm not simply telling you that. The reason is that I'm being honest with you here.
Yes, a true employment contract has to be of a certain degree of complexity. That is why attorneys draft these things. What matters is the contents of the contract, not what someone decides to label it. Plenty of employers label things "independent contractor agreement" but the contents of the document make it legally an employment contract.
Now, I'm not saying that you do not have a legal argument here. I'm not saying that you can't use this agreement that was drafted up for something. Yes, a court would be willing to consider it an attempt at a contract, but it will have to use its equitable powers to do so. I'm not going to try and teach you the entirety of contract law right now, but there are two sides to it....basic contract law and equity.
I'm saying that under basic contract law, that is not an employment contract because it does not limit the employer's ability to terminate the agreement or you.
Your arguments will have to be under equity and that swings on you having relied, to your detriment, on their promises. The laws of equity are concerned with making that which should have happened, happen. This is where you'll have to make your arguments to enforce the agreement that you have.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).