Thank you, kindly.Prosecutor's Leverage
If this case gets to trial
, the prosecutor is likely to call the MP who will make an appearance and explain what he feels happened. He may or may not bring his dashboard camera tape that can also show what happened (I think now, MPs must have one too in most cases), if there is one. Normally, the Judge (or Jury, if you have a jury trial) takes the word of an officer over the Defendant.Your Leverage
The prosecutor is normally very backed up. They are handling literally dozens of cases at once. Setting a matter for trial - jury trial, more so - is a serious issue since they have little time to prepare, file the proper motions, and generally make room for the trial to happen. In addition, the fact that there was no field sobriety test or breathalyzer really helps someone in your situation, as the prosecutor has no way to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that someone in your situation was intoxicated except any eyewitnesses and the MP.
I would retain counsel as soon as possible. While chances are still technically against the Defendant in a federal case (most end in convictions), a situation like this does bring extra hope.
I hope this helps and clarifies. Gentle Reminder: Use the SEND
button to keep chatting, or please rate
when finished. You may always ask follow ups at no charge after rating. Kindly rate my answer as one of the top three faces/stars
and then SUBMIT
, as this is how I get credit for my time with you. Rating my answer the bottom two faces/stars or failing to submit the rating does not give me credit and reflects poorly on me, even if my answer is correct
. I work very hard to formulate an informative and honest answer for you; please reciprocate my good faith.