For KD 1992: Some time ago I communicated with you about a case where my son was convicted of possession of Mj pipe and the case is now on appeal. The attorney general has recommended a new trial due to no trial defense counsel. The case has been in the judges possession now for over 7 months. There were two police officers who stopped the defendant the night of the arrest saying he did not stop at a stop sign. They decided to search him and the vehicle. One officer searched the vehicle and found nothing. The other officer searched the defendant and allegedly found a pipe. He was the main one who gave testimony that it was a marijuana pipe and he smelled it and it smelled like marajuana and allegedly the defendant agreed that it was marijuana. The defendant did not testify. Just found out today that the officer that gave that testimony died. What will happen if there is another trial since he was the one with the most damaging testimony?
They can offer his prior testimony into evidence by reading from the transcript normally.
However, if they reverse based on no trial counsel then I think the testimony from the prior trial would not be admissible since there was no lawyer present to cross examine him and therefore they would have to call the defendant who admitted to it.
I don't understand the part "..and therefore they would have to call the defendant who admitted to it." The defendant never testified. He acted as his own counsel. He did not admit to anything. It was simply alleged by the officer. When defendant asked the officer in cross examination if he had any recording of that conversation, the officer said no.
I thought you meant that the defendant had said it but just didn't testify at trial.
Or rather a co-defendant. they can't actually call the defendant in his own case.
realistically they just aren't going to be able to get that into evidence.
are you saying the evidence is not admissable and the case would be dismissed because they cant force the defendant to testify?
It doesn't necessarily mean the case is dismissed, I can't say one way or another without reviewing all the evidence, but the officer's testimony shouldn't be admissible if the case is reversed because the defendant didn't have a lawyer and they absolutely can't force the defendant to testify.
Best wishes. Let me know how it turns out/
There is no way to get the information to the appeal court judges that this officer has died is there? Proposition one was all about the errors that this officer made and this is a reverse and render request.
How rear is it that attorney general agrees with defendant and argues on the defendant's behalf on an appeal (in this case for a new trial) I know you would be guessing but would one percent of the time be in the ball park?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).