Criminal Law Questions? Ask a Criminal Lawyer.
There is part of the Post Conviction Relief Law in Oklahoma that says the following: §22 1084.
Evidentiary hearing Findings of fact and conclusions of law.
If the application cannot be disposed of on the pleadings and record, or there exists a material issue of fact, the court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing at which time a record shall be made and preserved. The court may receive proof by affidavits, depositions, oral testimony, or other evidence and may order the applicant brought before it for the hearing. A judge should not preside at such a hearing if his testimony is material. The court shall make specific findings of fact, and state expressly its conclusions of law, relating to each issue presented. This order is a final judgment...
This statement: "..A judge should not preside at such a hearing if his testimony is material.." is what I have a question on. In the APCR the defendant quotes the judge a number of times from the motion in limine hearing. Basicly quotes saying that if marijuana was not at high enough level to cause impairment then the marijuana evidence was more prejudicial than probative and should not be allowed in trial.
Is this type of statement from the judge considered material and would that disqualify him from presiding of a hearing?
Another question on this part of this statement:
If the application cannot be disposed of on the pleadings and record, or there exists a material issue of fact, the court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing at which time a record shall be made and preserved...
What does it mean "..a material issue of fact.." ? Would that be if , for example, testimony is needed from an expert to determine if 1 ng of thc would cause driving impaiment? If that is the case since studies were attached that showed that point and there were no objections by the prosecution to the statements in those studies, would a hearing and expert still be needed?
Hello again and thank you for your question.Is this type of statement from the judge considered material and would that disqualify him from presiding of a hearing?The quotes from the judge that you used from the transcript are material because they support your son's position that the evidence was important and made a difference in the verdict. It is unlikely the use of the quotes would disqualify the judge because they are quotes and you don't need his testimony, you already have it in the transcript. Nevertheless, if the judge, prosecutor or the defendant believed the judge's testimony was necessary then they could file a motion for the judge to recuse himself, or the judge could do so on his own motion. If there was an objection to the recusal, then there would be a hearing on that issue. It is unusual for a judge to recuse himself and very unusual for his testimony to be necessary. If for some reason the defendant did not want the trial judge to decide the APCR then this could be a way to get a different judge, but it would still be difficult to show that the judge's testimony is needed when the transcript is available and the reasons for his decision are set forth in the transcript.What does it mean "..a material issue of fact.." ?A material fact is considered one that is necessary to the jury's determination. The fact of that the amount of thc did not have an impact on the defendant's condition or ability to drive, may be considered a material fact. The prosecutor's argument that the jury did not need the expert's testimony to convict is essentially an argument that the evidence is not material. However, that position, as you noted, is contradicted by the emphasis and importance the prosecutor placed on the testimony at trial. In addition, that issue will be considered in the context of the larger material issue of whether there was ineffective assistance of counsel. If that is the case since studies were attached that showed that point and there were no objections by the prosecution to the statements in those studies, would a hearing and expert still be needed?Generally, with material facts, the party with the burden of proof (in this case the defendant) must put forth some evidence on the issue, which must then be met by evidence from the other party. In this case, the defendant has set forth evidence challenging the accuracy and scientific reliability of the expert's testimony at trial. In order to prevail, the judge still must credit and accept the defendant's evidence to rule in his favor. This can be done with the studies. If the judge is satisfied with the studies, then he may not need additional testimony from the defendant's expert, and decide on the submissions without a hearing. But, it would be unusual for there to be no hearing if the judge is inclined to allow the petition. Generally, petitions are denied without a hearing where the defendant has failed to include sufficient evidence of a material fact in the petition. Therefore, in your son's case he will most likely get a hearing.Please feel free to ask any follow-up questions.
Thank you for the information.
You said: "..In this case, the defendant has set forth evidence challenging the accuracy and scientific reliability of the expert's testimony at trial. In order to prevail, the judge still must credit and accept the defendant's evidence to rule in his favor. This can be done with the studies.."
How likely is it that the judge will consider the fact that prosecution did not challenge the studies in making his decision to accept the studies? It seems to me that would be tremendously significant in this case.
You also said: "..But, it would be unusual for there to be no hearing if the judge is inclined to allow the petition. Generally, petitions are denied without a hearing where the defendant has failed to include sufficient evidence of a material fact in the petition. Therefore, in your son's case he will most likely get a hearing.."
Is there any significance that the prosecution has not requested a hearing nor have they responded to the defendants reply to their response which was filed three weeks ago?
I suspect that the DA has information from the investigation of the OSBI toxicologist even though the the investigation may not be complete yet. Can the defendant file a motion to compel to get any information the prosecution might have on that investigation?
Thank you for the good example. Below I have put down the things the defendant would want to know. There were more in the example. Do you think this is enough?
I wonder if the defendant should specifically request info about the specific toxicologist in question?
NOW COMES the Defendant, (Defendant's Name)., in the above-styled and numbered cause, and respectfully XXXXX XXXXX Court to order the State of Oklahoma to reveal and produce the following:
1.Any documents or records of any kind which, in any way, question or raise doubts about the accuracy or reliability of any scientific and/or expert testing.
2.Any evidence, documentary or otherwise, which might undermine or tend to undermine the credibility of any state witness.
3. All exculpatory evidence which the prosecuting attorneys and their agents may have in their files.
4.Any evidence of any kind which is in any way mitigating.
In the event that any of the above-requested evidence exists, the Defendant moves that the Court order the prosecuting attorney to produce the same for inspection by the defense at the earliest possible time the existence of such evidence becomes known to the State.
Defendant would show the Court that the failure to produce the above requested evidence would result in the suppression of evidence and a violation of the United States Constitution, Amendments V, VI and XIV. See Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419,XXXXX 1555, 131 L. Ed. 2d 490 (1995); Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83,XXXXX ll94, l0 L.Ed.2d 2l5 (l963); Ashley v. Texas, 3l9 F.2d 80 (5th Cir. l963).
WHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully XXXXX XXXXX the Court grant this Motion in all things.
No problem. Thanks for your response.
I have a question on who to send the Motion for Production of Exculpatory and Mitigating Evidence to. I am wondering if in addition to the Judge and primary State trial counsel a copy should be mailed to the DA himself? And should the prosecutor who made the response to the APCR (who was not the trial counsel) also get a copy?
Over two weeks ago I emailed ASCLD with question about when the investigation would be completed. The response was "we should be concluding our investigation in the near future." I emailed again last Thursday asking if I could get an update on when the investigation would be over and I also stated that the DA and Judge probably already know what is going on and I was the only one in the dark. I received one of those auto-responses saying the contact would be out of office through Aug 23 which was last Friday.
Here it is Tuesday and I still have not received a response. This contact generally responds the same day he receives email. Can the defendant send a subpeona to that company requesting any information relating to the investigation? And if they have any information couldn't the investigator be subpeonaed to to testify AT a hearing in this PCR?
Another point I am just adding, I saw on there web site there process for investigations and it said something like they don't give their conclusion to investigation until a trial or any post conviction proceedings are completed. Can they legally hold on to exculpatory evidence knowing it is helpful to a defendant or again can the defendant subpeona that information?
You said "If I recall correctly, ASCLD is the private accrediting organization for the state lab that employed the prosecutor's expert. Because they are not state actors involved in the prosecution of the defendant, they are not required to turn over exculpatory evidence.."
So ASCLD could in fact not send out any report of what they found until after all post convictions proceedings are over couldn't they? But OSBI would be obligated to report whatever they found.
What if OSBI says the investigation is internal and their guidelines don't allow them to give out internal information?
What do you think about going to the newpaper, to an investigative reporter, in a situation like this if some information does not come from DA shortly?
In a previous post you said: "File the Motion with the court, and send a copy to the prosecutor who responded to the APCR and a copy to the trial prosecutor."
This was done. Did you not include the judge for one of the persons to mail the copy to because he should automatically get a copy? At this court now and then you will see where they say "copy to DA and Court" when something is filed. Are all "Motions" suppose to automatically go to the DA and Trial Court Judge? (No mention was made that this Motion was sent to DA and Judge. I called and ask court clerk she said she did not know but she did not think so. So I sent a copy to the judge also.)
Update on ASCLD I sent another email last Friday for an update and the contact did apologize for not responding to the previous email. He said they were waiting for one more court transcript before they make their decision and the decision should be made in 2 to 3 weeks. I don't know if he was talking about a transcript from this case or maybe they are also looking at transcripts from other cases where this toxicologist has testified.
Hello again.Generally, the motion that is filed with the court goes in the court file and the judge has access to that file, so a separate copy to the judge is not necessary, and this is the practice I'm most familiar with. A copy of the motion should always be served on the opposing party. That said, each court may have there own specific procedure regarding filing motions and copies, and an extra copy to the judge would guarantee everyone gets a copy who should get one and it's always wise to confirm with the court clerk. I am glad to hear that the investigation is proceeding. It would seem to be a good thing if they are looking at other cases where the expert may have testified as it would show either that he testified erroneously on other occasions, or that he only testified the way he did in your son's case thereby singling him out. Either way, it doesn't seem like it can be good for the expert.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).