How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Legal-Guru Your Own Question
Legal-Guru, Criminal Justice Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 1366
Experience:  Experienced Criminal Trial Attorney since 1998.
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Legal-Guru is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

in California criminal law is there any points of authority

This answer was rated:

in California criminal law is there any points of authority and or precedence ruling in favor of the defendants due process rights where for a preliminary hearing a body attachment was issued for a procsecution witness/alleged victim without first presenting the issuing judge proof of subpoena service even though a subpoena was actulay served but proof was provided after the fact.Moreover,the procection requested a body attachment.the judge (on record)
ordered the proof be shown first. the prosecution (while the judge was distracted) approached and convinced the clerk to issue the body attachment without first showing proof of service as ordered by the judge. The result was the body attachment was used to provide testimony.Is this caus
Welcome to JustAnswer. Are you familiar with the legal concept of "standing"?
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

No, I am not familiar with the legal concept "standing"

Ok, well it's something that many people have a difficult time understanding and it's going to outcome determinative in the scenario you provided. Let me give you a couple of examples of how it comes into play.

(1) Let's say my local public school district required every elementary student to recite the Lord's prayer every morning or face suspension. That practice is clearly unconstitutional per U.S. Supreme Court opinions. Let's say I'm an atheist and I want to sue to make them stop. If I don't attend the school or have a child that attends the school, my lawsuit would be thrown out because I do not have standing.

(2) Here's a scenario that is a little more applicable. Say I stash some drugs in my friend's house. The police conduct an illegal search of his house and find my drugs. They have evidence linking me to the drugs so charge me with constructively possessing the drugs. I cannot successfully object to the search of my friend's house no matter how illegal it was, and it does not matter that the evidence that was illegally seized is being used against me.

In your scenario, if something improper or illegal was done to secure the attendance of a witness, it was the witness's rights that were violated and they are the only person who can object to it. The defendant lacks standing to challenge a violation of the witness's rights.

Hope that makes sense. I realize it's contrary to what most non-lawyers believe.
Legal-Guru and 6 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related Criminal Law Questions