My husband has 729 days of earned time owed him by the state of Colorado that was never applied to his sentence… he served day for day… and now they say it can not be applied to his parole time. There has to be a way to have the time he is OWED to his parole and get him off of paper.
In August of 2005 Kent was sentenced to a 9-year sentence with 5-year parole (case number XXXXX all other cases fall under this one) to run concurrently with a governing Federal sentence. At that time he was given, 465 days of earned time/credit for time served in DOC custody awaiting trial. I believe that was a total of 15-18 months in custody. He was then taken into Federal Custody to serve his time.
On 28 July 2011, Kent was released from Leavenworth and into State custody. From Aug. 2005 – July 2011, no earned time was applied to Kent’s DOC sentence, he served day for day. However upon his release from the Feds to a halfway house in Colorado Springs in 2011 the DOC started applying earned time once again. The State says that it was his responsibility to produce the records for the earned time since he was in Federal custody. However at the same time they say that Kent (any inmate) is not allowed contact with Time Comp and only family or friends may contact them on his behalf.
Kent’s State sentence should have been finished at this time, and his parole started if his earned time had been applied. The DOC has treated his case with prejudice to someone holding the same sentence within the state of Colorado because of his Federal ruling sentence.
In January of 2012 the State put him into county jail in the Springs from the halfway house for a 3 month drug furlough program, because of a hot BA given at the halfway house. He was released back to the halfway house in May, and then at the end of August he was sent back to county due to a violation from the State to finish his time in custody until his mandatory release date.
It was at that time I started calling Time Comp to inquire about his earned time that should have been applied to his sentence. After giving them copies of all of his certificates earned while in Federal Custody, Mary at Time Comp informed me that just going off of the finish date/Month on the certificates, because at that time we did not have his work records, that the State owed Kent 729 days of earned time. In the end they ended up applying only 88 days of earned time to Kent’s sentence for immediate release.
I asked what happened to the rest of the time owed, and they informed me that they are very sorry that his mandatory release date was not accounted for correctly in the past, but that it could not be applied to Parole time.
Upon his immediate release in September 2012, Kent was then officially on Probation with the Feds and Parole with the State. The Federal probation took precedence over the State and he only had to meet once a month with his State Parole officer, but all UA’s and counseling were done under the Federal supervision.
In February 2013 Kent was taken into Federal custody on a Violation. In April he was sentenced to serve 12 months at the end of which he will be off of Federal paper for good. (The State has not violated him and considers him to still be on parole in good standing.)
It is because of this that we now want to fight the State for the earned time that was never applied. It is my understanding that according to State law, for each day held over a mandatory release date there is a monetary amount of around $300 usd that should be owed to that person. Is this true? We would like to see him either off of Parole, or to be compensated for the amount of time that he was held in custody past what should have been his mandatory release date due to the state holding his sentence prejudice.
I now have copies of his entire work duty while in Federal Custody. I also have copies of all certificates earned, plus his 32 college credits earned through the Oxford University. With his work duties added he should be owed even more time than the original 729 days.
I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
Hi, thank you for your answer! I've spoken with Mary Carlson at Time Comp, who was referenced in the foot notes even of Edwards vs. People. She is ADAMANT that this is ONLY to pre confinement time. Even though this is just what we were looking for in regards to "sentence" meaning the whole period of time to include Parole.
Could you please tell me what kind of motion we would need to present, or what might be the next step in making them acknowledge that this earned time should be applied to his sentence??
Thank you very much!
Hello again and thank you for being patient with me while I try to work through this!
Okay, I have a letter ready to send to Mary Carlson at time comp along with a copy of his work duty while in federal custody. I know this is just process here as she has already told me that she will deny his request for this time to be applied to his parole. However by me submitting this to her she said they would have to open his file for review again on the matter, even though it "won't do any good" she said.
Could you please tell me what our "plan of action" or the correct chain of command would be from here? What courts do we file with after she deny's us? Do we file against the DOC? Do we file in the county in which he was sentenced? Or do we first need to exhaust our remedies as far as the grievance process goes within the DOC before we even start in the courts?
I just don't want to jump head first into filing motions with the court for them to tell us we first should have filed grievances and been denied there beforehand. I want to be certain that we know what we are doing in case we only get the one chance, and I don't want to miss a step.
For some reason every lawyer I've contacted about this has not been able to "take a case of this complicated nature at this time"
I do not see this as very complicated; they owe him the time and they need to apply it to his parole. I was starting to believe that maybe it wasn't possible until you replied to me with that case law and now I am just certain that it should be cut and dry!
Thank you so much for everything!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).