Hello and thank you for allowing me the opportunity to assist you.Q: Does the re-confinement on May 30, 2013 extend running of the one year statute of limitationA: No. The re-confinement is a separate incident. The confinement ended on June 19th when he was released. The re-confinement was based on a bench warrant for failing to appear when required. That's a totally separate matter, separate incident, and theoretically a separate cause of action (though I don't believe it is a successful cause of action).I am truly sorry if this is bad news, but please understand that it would be unfair to you (and unprofessional of me) to provide you with anything less than an honest response. However, if your concerns were not satisfactorily addressed, then please let me know, and I will be happy to clarify my answer. I do ask that you rate me based upon whether I answered your question, and not based upon whether the answer was good news or bad news. Your positive feedback is greatly appreciated. Thank you for using our service! If you would like to direct additional legal questions to me in the future, then please type "To VAMD" in the subject line of your question.
While I understand what you are saying, I am not talking about false arrest, which I understand the statute of limitations expired on June 19th. I also understand that the bench warrant was for failing to appear on time, but the confinement was based on the original criminal charges, with no bond being set.
Does that make any difference?
A: Unfortunately, no, it makes no difference. There are two separate confinements. I don't think a judge anywhere would agree that there was one long confinement lasting for more than a year in which the plaintiff was not actually confined for 95% of that time. The confinement ended when he walked out of the jail. Of course, as I stated in my other answer, that also means he may have a separate cause of action for the second confinement that would not be barred by the statute of limitations.
I hope that helps, and I wish him luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).