Good evening. Thank you for your question. What evidence do they have of your guilt?
Do you know under what code section you are being charged?
Certainly. Take your time.
No problem at all.
Thank you. You said that your friends blew a 1.0. Could you have possibly meant a 0.01, or a 0.10? 1.0 would be fatal, 0.10 would be drunk, and 0.01 would be half a beer.
Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX sense.
I can potentially see why you were charged under this particular statute. The crime is not being under the influence of alcohol, consuming alcohol, or purchasing alcohol. Under subdivision (C) of that statute, "It is a violation of the Liquor Control Act for a minor to buy, attempt to buy, receive, possess or permit himself to be served with alcoholic beverages." (emphasis added). Possession means that it is within the person's domain and control. If you have a drink in front of you, holding it in your hand, for example, that is a violation of the law even if you have not consumed a drop of it.
You know the circumstances--do you believe that you had possession of alcohol, even if you did not consume any?
Well, that's what we call "circumstantial evidence". :-) The state has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and that's certainly possible to prove with circumstantial evidence, but not as easy as proving with direct evidence.
If someone walks in the door wearing rain gear and soaked from head to toe, that is circumstantial evidence that it is raining outside. Direct evidence is if you look out the window and see rain falling. It's harder to prove that it is actually raining under the first scenario. Likewise, it is harder to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt that a minor had possession of alcohol if the minor isn't found to actually have possession of alcohol.
Correct. And the nuances of every situation is different, so I would recommend having the evidence, including the police report (which would be generally available after the first court appearance) and your case examined by an attorney in person before relying on any information as complete or advice. But that said, it's certainly going to be easier to prove possession with your friends who blew .10s.
With a .00 and empty containers, it raises questions, and only reasonable doubt is needed for a dismissal or acquittal.
Well, it wasn't a good decision, but the good news is that it isn't likely to derail any of your lives. It's not like armed robbery. It's just not that serious an offense and I would seriously doubt that it would hold any of you back in your lives or careers.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).