Thank you so much for using JustAnswer.com. I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
So I would have to bring my charges to the same DA that called in the drug expert to testify for them. Is that correct? Could a person bring his complaint to the attorney general instead of the DA or at least after he was turned down by the DA?
I have been made aware that Oklahoma is not a zero tolerance state. I checked to OSCN web site to see the requirements to be convicted of DUI. In Oklahoma to be convicted of Driving under the influence of an intoxicant other than alchohol (and marijuna is listed among the different drugs), one of the elements is that a person must be proven to be under the influence of the intoxicant, not just have some in his system.
You said "..Thus, the expert testimony would have contradicted the state's alleged expert." I am confused by this statement. The defendant did not have a drug expert to refute prosecution expert at trial but after conviction and being incarcerated a relative found out from a drug expert that the prosecution's expert testimony was not in line with any scientific data on this subject. This is why the defendant and family are wanting to know if the lying expert can be charge with lying under oath. You explained it was up to the DA or the Court to charge him. So my question on the last post was would the defendant have to go through the same DA that hired this expert in the first place? We know what that outcome is going to be. They are not going to charge him. So there must be some other way. Is it possible to take this to the state attorney general? I have heard you can even file a complaint against the DA with the state attorney general.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).