If a person that I am engaged in a business dispute with over money states the following:"I want money, if I don't get money that'll be ok because it'll cost you money you'll have to hire lawyers, etc:"1. is that a punitive act That would depend on the context and what has transpired. For instance, if he is the "right" person in the business dispute and he is indicating that if you don't settle up appropriately he will have to sue you because yes, he wants money, in fact money he believes you owe him - it seems to nothing punitive about it.2. and would it be sufficient enough to prove reasonable doubt in a title case?I am not seeing it, barring something more - but reasonable doubt is typically in a criminal case and a title case is typically a civil matter. That civil matter may have a standard of proof akin to " a preponderance of the evidence" or "clear and convincing evidence" (the former being an easier burden to meet for the plaintiff). For instance, let's say the plaintiff's statement to you was surrounded by a mere he said, she said type evidence (nothing physical, but mere testimonial) AND you had him making the above statement. It would 'tend' to show that he has less than just motives. I say 'tends' to show, but like most evidence, it is not conclusively shown by that statement, but that statement adds to any other evidence regarding his credibility, motives, and in the end, to whether he is being honest about his allegations. Of course, if crossed on it, he'd likely testify that he "didn't mean it that way, only that he wanted his just moneys back that the defendant refused to pay me" - and the jury or judge (factfinder) would decide what they believed to be true, given ALL the evidence.
Optional Information: Country relating to Question: United StatesState (if USA): Virginia
I hope this helps! My goal is to provide you with excellent and accurate service – if you feel you have gotten anything less, please reply back, I am happy to address follow-up questions. Kindly rate me "excellent" when you are done. I look forward to assisting you in the future, should you have legal questions.
ok here's the situation. A shady car dealer that i used to work for owed me money and gave me a car to pay me for part of the debt. Our deal was i was supposed to sell the car after she signed the title over and give her anything over $2000. The car sold for only $2100 (instead of the estimated $4000), netting her only $100 per our agreement. she had sour grapes and then tried to rework the deal after the fact. I recently went through some recording I did of our phone conversations at the time and found one where she said to me "I may not get money but you'll pay by hiring attorneys and missing work. that's what I'm referring to?
Ah! I think you and I have interacted on this before. As noted above, the factfinder would have to believe one of you with regard to who, if anyone, breached the agreement. If she proves that you were not supposed to sell the car for less than $4000, then it could find you breached and that she was merely commenting on the fact that should she lose the case, she will not feel too bad because at least she inconvenienced you. On the other hand, if they find that you had no such $4k agreement, just an agreement to sell for at least $2k so she could pay you back, you will have won the case anyway, and her subsequent statements won't much matter. It really does seem to be a he said/she said, unless you have email or something showing the agreement terms.That all being said, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the breach by you, the defendant, by more than a preponderance of the evidence, at least. Often when there is nothing but "he/she said" with no other witnesses or evidence, the plaintiff loses, because she is unable to meet her burden.
The reason I was asking about the abuse of process is because she actually convinced some detective she knew to issue a warrant about this transaction. So part of my "punishment" by her includes my have being arrested! Does that matter any? The civil action I am suing her to prove she owed me money.
I dont think you follow entirely. She place CRIMINAL charges on me. Also come to find out she has done this before, given an ex employee/boyfriend of hers a car for payment and then renegged and called the cops.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).