Criminal Law Questions? Ask a Criminal Lawyer.
Hello, and thank you for contacting Just Answer. I am an expert here and and I look forward to assisting you today.
Can you provide a few facts, just sentence or two, to put this into context?
well, nj has an internal affairs policy, it was last updated in sept of 2011, by the nj attorney general, this states that every law enforcement department must without delay take internal affairs complaints regardless of time of day or day of week
And what happened in your particular case?
i call the county prosecutors office after hours, they are closed, give another number to call on the automated message,.it says to call that number and ask for the on call supervisor,....... which i have done,..... and the people answering the phones refuse to do it, threaten me, hang up,.. tell me they have no idea what im talking about, etc etc,........ over and over again
Do you have any idea why they are doing this?
lawsuits are about asking that question, is this right?
No, not exactly.
They had to have had an illegal reason for their actions. The Supreme Court of the US has stated that a police department isn't obligated to perform their functions.
It's a stupid ruling, but that is the current state of the law.
i'm not a mnind reader,..... i can speculate , but that wouldnt be good,.. it would be a question in my lawsuit - "why are you acting like this"
If they were refusing to take the complaint for an illegal reason, like race, age, gender, etc. then there could be a lawsuit.
You could also file a complaint with the state AG office.
it is ilegal to disobey your boss no, to disobey a direct order from the nj attrorney general?
well, listen, you are speculating as welkl
the law suit will ask them why,.. if the reason they state is ilegal, then ill win, if it is legal, then ill lose, right?
The AG is not the boss of a city police department.
actually it is in nj
If you can get to that point.
the only person a chief is accountable to is the attorney general, according to nj law
If you can't provide a reason that they are acting illegally your case will be dismissed for "failure to state a claim".
No, that's not correct as far as the law.
The AG can make sure the police are acting legally, but they aren't the "boss" of the police chief. The police chief answers to the city council.
the c;laim is they are refusing to follow th epolicy of the nj attorney general,, who recently came out and said it has to be followed, based on a nj aclu investigative report on 487 municpalities
you are wrong,,
i talked to the citry council here who claim they have no say over th epolice
I'll opt out and let someone else assist you. Good luck with it.
getr someomne else on here that knows nj law
accordinbg to you a person whould have to know why a cop beat the crap out of him to file a law suit
that doesnt sound right to me
how would the victim know "whyz' another person did what they did
Thank you so much for using JustAnswer.com. I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO XXXXX CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
PLEASE NOTE WELL WE ARE DEALING WITH LAWS OF 50 STATES PLUS FEDERAL LAWS, AS WELL AS DEALING WITH OTHER CUSTOMERS, SO PLEASE BE PATIENT AND BE ASSURED YOU ARE NOT BEING IGNORED.
There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be taking a break.
You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-paulmjd/ or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”
so what you are saying is that it is only lip-service to the public,....... that the attorney general can publish online its' policies on internal affairs - http://www.nj.gov/lps/dcj/agguide/internalaffairs2000v1_2.pdf , and the NJ ACLU can do a big time secret invrestigation with a report blasting over 400 law enforcements departments in nj for not obeying the policy,.... the nj attorney general who by political definition hates the aclu agrees with the aclu,-------- but not of that matters,...... a person can continue to call to make a complaint against an officer, and continue to be yelled at, hung up on, threatened with harassment charges, claim they have no idea what internal affairs is, etc etc etc, time and time again,...... a their is no way TO FORCE THEM THREW THE LAW TO MAKE THEM OBEY THE POLICY? EVER. ? CORRECT?
YOU LAST PARAGRAPH, SAYS "COMPLANT AGAINST OFFICERS, NOT INTERNAL AFFAIRS COMPLAINT,.. INTERNAL AFFAIRS COMPLAINTS ARE DIFFERENT FROM A REGULAR COMPLAINT, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT SWORN STATEMENTS IN NJ,, CAN BE DONE ANONOMYOUSLY,.. AND ARE SUPPOSE TO BE TAKEN REGARDLESS OF THE TIME OF DAY OR DAY OF WEEK.
RIGHT, BUT IF A CITIZEN WANTS THE ia COMPLAINT TO BE taken as per the ag's policy, and by virtue of looking and reading the ag's policy online,... and the harrassment is not a crime in nj, and the person, like me, continues to try to make to complaint anonomyously,..... if they attempt to, annd actrualy do so, find out who i am, and charge me with harrssment,.. then i would have an additional ;part of the law suit, because in nj,.. you cant get intenet of telephone information without a grandy jury, which you wouyld need a crime, or homeland security,.. which is not the case here,...... and even if that does happen, whats the fine, like 200 dollars?, and then i'll get to talk in court for hours, til rthe judge shuts me down,,... and if he shuts me down prematurly, ., i could appeal that and win, be remanded back, and be allowed to continue to talk,.. isnt this all true?
I WAS ASSUMING A GUILTY VERDICT, I WAS TALKING ABOUT AEFENDAT GIVING A SENTENCING STATEMENT,..... THAT IN FACT CANT BE SHUT DOWN,, UNLESS THE DEFENDANT GETS OFF TOPIC,....... AS LONG AS A DEFENDANT IS ON TOPIC, HE CAN TALK LIKE MT SMITH GOES TO WASHINTGTON,..... VERY HARD FOR A JUDGE TO SHUT A DEFENDANT DOWN ION SENTENCING HEARING, NO?
I WASNT TALKIN G ABOUT A DEFENSE, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE COURT WILL WANT TO COVER UP AS MUCH POLICE MIS CONDUCXT AS POSSIBLE, AND AS MUCH MIS USE AS POSSIBLE, ECT ETC,..
I WAS TALKING ANOUT THE SENTENCING PARTY, WHERE A DEFENDANT CANB MAKE A STATEMENT,...
FOR A THERE HAVE BEN CASESWHERE JUSGES HAD TO SHUT THE COURT ROOM DOWN, AND CNTINUE TO ALLOW A DEFENDANT TO TALK ON SENTENCING, ON VBIDEOTAPE, AS LONG AS HE STAYED ON TOPIC,.. THERE IS A CASE A GUY GOT TO TALK FOR DAYS ON IT,... VERY HARD TO LEGALY SHUT THAT DOWN, NO?
NONE THE LESS,.. THIS IS WHAT YOU HAVE TO "SAY" , have, to say,.. whats in your back pocket , as available to say,...... but you are not a court,........ and no mattr how many times i call to make an internal affairs complaint,.. i am never going to be allowed to do it,.. and the government is never going to legaly be allowed to find out who i am,....... so it i9s a stnd off,.. i'll continue to do it, every so often, once a week, once every 2 weeks, once a month, 3 times a week, whatever itr will be, for as long as i live,..... and i dont see how how it can be stopped,...... the only way to stop it, would be for the governement to do the right thing, and allow the complaint/complaints, be entered as pewr the ag's p[olicy,...why would the government want to prevent a person in the first place,.......
the monmouth county prosecutors office,.. the largest police deprtment in the county,..... is not allowing anonomyous internal affairs complaint tiobe made regardless of time of day or day of week,.... but thge people on the phones are taking it to another level of rights violations, by making threats, hanging up,. etc etc,....... i gret these guiys on audio doing it, i think i have a slam dunk law suiot for punitive damages,....
heck,, in 2009, i wrote them via thier websie webmail about an officer just graduated the academy, handed his government issued firearm to a guy that bukllied me my entire life, who put it at my head and pulled the trigger,...................... thecaptain , captain powers, illegaly found out who i was, despite state v reed, came to my rtesidence, and told me i had to make a sworn statement to make the cokmplaiknt-- this is not truwe, and i van sick and tired of lawenforcement peopkle screwing with my rights, peoples rights,..... internal affairs comp[laints are not sworn statements, but have to go into the personel file of the officer
suing people is not "nice",.. i agree with a lot of nj judges about certain things in lkw suit, or criminal complaints are not "nice" way to go about things. this is the beauty of my arguement,.. i want to be "nice", and get my complaints on the books, properly,..... as per the AG internakl afairs thing,.. insterad of filing a law suit,.... get it?,...... as long as i keep up the high road,...... then, eventually, i will have a slsam dunk lawsuit against them, as a last resort,........ because certainjly, the people that are refusing me to make the official internal affairs complaintys, are not doing what the residents, citizens, taxpayers, voters,. are asking them do do fopr their paycheck
so i got them on this, and they dont have me
RIGHT, THATS WHAT YOU SAY,..... but i dont have to know that,in an acdemic waty,.. even the disclamer on just answer says i dont have to know it,... so put my understanding in this context,......... as far as i know, based on the ag's policy,.. i am allowed to do it,.. to call and try to make the complaints,.. if and when the governments wishes to say what yo have stated,. and beat me,.. whats thew ukltim,ate fine, 200 dollars, 500 dollars?
OF COURSE, I AM PERFECTLY WILLING TO SAY THEY WONT TAKE THE IA COMPLAINYS AS PER THE AG, THE QWUESTION IS ARE THEY WILLING TO ADMITT IT?.... NO JUDGE WILL GIVE ME 30 DAYS AND A 500 DOLLAR FINE FOR TRYING TO MAKE AN INTERNAL AFFAIRS COMPLAINT,....... IF THEY DO,.. THAT IS WINNABLE ONCAPPEAL, I AMCONFIDENT OF THAT,...... FURTHERMORE,.......A CITIZEN, RESIDENT, TAX PAYER, SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE FORCED IN THGIS POSITION,..... GET IT?,... WE PAY THE PEOPLE IN THESE POSITIONS IN GOVERNMENT TO OBEY IT,... I WANT TO FIND OUT WHY THEY ARE NOT OBEYING IOT,.. I MEAN, MY GOD MAN, ISNT THAT KIBNDF OF EVIL,.. THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TELLS THEM TO DO THIS,.. EVERYONE, EVERYSIDE OF IT, BELKIEVES THEY SHOULD, WE PAY THEOIR SALARIES TO DO IT, ANMD YET THEY STYILL REFUSE,.. IS THAT NIOT THE DEFEINITION OF EVIL?
YOU DONT THINK YOUR PERSONAL OPINION MATTERS? IS THAT NOT A PROBLEM WITH OUR SOCIRTY, THAT PEOPLE THINK THEIT PERSONAL OPINIONS DONT MATTER?... THGINK OF IT THGIS WAY,...... I WORKED AS AN ANALYTICAL CHEMIST FOR OVER 20 YEARS IN TE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTICAL, AND TO A MAN, EVERYONE IN THE FACTORIES, PLANTS, LABS, ALL HAD TO DO WHAT THEY WERE TOLD TO DO, NO MATTER WHAT, EVERYONE,.. WHY IS IT PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT, ESPEVIALLY LAW ENFORCEMENT, BELIEVE THEY DO NOT HAVE TO DO WHAT THEY ARE BEING ASKED TO DO?, AND THIS IS NOT AN ISOLATED INCIDENT, , IT OCCURS EVERY DAY, IN EVERY JURISDICTION IN THAT NATION,..... WHAT THE CIRCUMSTANCES ARE , ARE INSANE, NO?
WELL,. ACTUALLY, BY DISCALAMER OF JUSTANSWER, YOU HAVE PROVIDED ME A LEGAL RESULT OR ANSWER, BECAUSE THAT IS NOT WHAT JUSTANSWER DOES,.. IF THE COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICER/ POLICE DEPARTMENT, TRIEDE TO ARGUE THAT,.. I WOULD HAVE TO ARGUE BACK, THAT NO, I DID NOT OBTAIN LEGAL ADVICE
see,, your answer to me on saturday may 4, at 1:03 om about states
"The violation you are alleging is a violation of a policy set up by the Attorney General, not even a New Jersey statute.Thus, you are referring to a recent "opinion" on "policy" of the Attorney General. The Attorney General does not make laws under the Constitutional separation of powers, the legislature makes laws, the governor (in this case) enforces laws and the courts say what those laws are."
So you were wrong in your answer because the following is true :::::
if you would just read page 3 of the odcument link below,, you WILL SEE IT IS A LAW,, AND A VERY SERIOUS LAW, A NJ LEGISLTIVE LAW,, THAT SAYS ALL POLICE DEPARARTMENTS MUST OBET THE NJ NJ ATTORNEY GENERALS POLICY AND GUIDELINES AS TO INTERNAL AFFAIRS COMPLAINTS
ALSO READ PAGE 4,, HECK READ THE ENTIRE INTRODUCTION. I do not know if you intentionaly gave me false information,.....but i wil give you a chance to correcdt yourself, otherwise i have no coice but to ask for a refund fron justanswer.
did you read the policy and procedures, ..... page 3 and 4, and 5? the polices must be consistant with this policy, any inconsistancy would be grounds for a federal lawsuit. read it. do you work for the state, are you a cop or a prosecutor? trying to supplement your income? listen. ANY REASONABLE PERSON CAN READ THE INTRODUCTION PAGES AND UNDERSTAND THT EACH POLICE DEPARTMNENT MUST OBEY THIS.
I AM GOING TO FILE A FEDERAL LAWSUIT AND A COMPLAINT WITH THE AGS OFFICE,.. BUT FIRST I NEED TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY , WHERE I CAN GO TO HIS OFFICE, AND MAKE THE PHONE CALLS AROUND 8-10 POM AT NIGHT, AND RECORD THE COUNTY AS MANY TIMES AS POSSIBLE VIOLATING MY RIGHTS,... THEN IT WILL BE SLAMDUNK LAWSUIT WITH PUNITIVE DAMAGES
I WISH I COULD COPY AND PASTE the words in here from the policy,.. but it is not open to interpetation. the words say what they say,.... VEREY CLERLY.
PEOLE HAVE WRITTEN LAW SUITS ON TOILET PAPER FROM FEDERAL PRISON AGAINST THE OGVERNEMNT THAT HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY FEDERAL JUDGES. BUT I WILL WRITE IS PROPERLY,... AND SUBMIT IT PROPERLY. anyone can walk up to a fedewral court window and even ask for help in doing so,... and they have to help you,, give you a place to fil out the forms, etc.... and you file it,...... thats it,...
i have called after hours probably 100 times already, over the course of months,... some nights it is 5-10 calls as they keep hanging up on me------- certainmly if this is their policy, it is not consistant with the ag's policy,......... and if it is not their policy to do this,.. then they are violation their policy,.. the law is clear on this.
why would i want them to investigate it,... the ag's office,.. they will protect the departments, a law suit can enable me and experts i hire to investigate it,...... to request and obtain everything ,... in discovery,.... in questions,.. i ask the questions, i am the one filing the lawsuit, it is up to the state to answer my questions in a federal filing,....
it is a no brainer at this point.
no judge state or federal can accept a citizen being put off or hung up on 100's of times over months, trying to make internal affairs complainmts,....... imagine the 10's of thousands of people in nj this is happening to every year.
laywers/police/prosecutors/government/ to a man, always say the law is being misinterpeted when it is something they do not or can not comply with,...........
the monmouth county prosecutors office may not have personel on hand to handle internal affairs complaints after hours,.......... but if this is true, they are in violation of the law, that state that the policy, to be consistant with the a's policy, they must someone there to take the complaints at any time, 24 hours a day, everyday of the year.
it is a no brainer
OFFICERS DONT ANSWER THE PHONES,.. TH EPEOPLE ANSWERING THE PHONES ARE phone operators at the 911 cal center for monmouth county communications,.. but you do not dial 911 to get them,, you dial the after hours number given to us through themain number of themonmouth county prosecutors office, where they sat to dial that number, and ak for the on call supervisor,.... which they refuse to connect you to.
this policy of putting people off, threatening callers, hang ing up,.. so on and so fiorth,.. can not be consitant with any lawful policy,...
they are liable for their actions,,,....
iif a police officer shoots an unarmed suspect,. for no good reason,, it doesnt matter the policy says they can do it,.. what matters is that this is what they did,..
ok,, and then in discovery , in the questions,..... i can ask for the documentation,....... cause sometimes they do put you threw , but it takes hours of calling and hang ups, but that is rare,...........but then you are suppose to get feedback on it, even if anonomyous.the county communications center asks for your number,...... once they get the phone number you are calling from, they can trace it and find out who you are,.. that defeats the purpose of having it be anonomyoius. see my point?
but even when once in a blue moon you do get through,....... the police do not handle it as per the ag's guidelines,....
all they want to do is make it go away,..... the bigger the complaint, the more they make it go away,....
but at this point thats is just icing on the cake
what i need to do, is hire an attorney with a phone recording device in his office, place the calls from his office after hours, with him there as a witness and officer of the court,...... over several;d days a week, over several weeks,.. get it all recorded
then hit them with it,..in a law suit,..
the aclu couldnt do this, cause there investigation, this past year, calling over 400 nj police departments,.. they didnt have an internal affairs complaint to actual;y make,.. they tested the system,...... and found that nearly every department failed to know or obey the ag's policy
so the ag said he would train everyone in every department on it
appearantly no one got that memo
there should be no catch 22 as you say,.. their should be a numbering system to call back and find out the outcome, in order to comply with the ag's policy,...
the 2nd part of your answer is that, no part of their written policy can be inconsistant with the ag's policy-- thats what the njac law says,.....
must be consistant,...
so any action taken, that isnt consistant with the ag's policy is by default ilegal under the njac law
i think i got that over a barrel,...
finding an attorney to hire with a recording device, willing to help me screw them over in another thing,....
actually it is not impossible, they can do it be email,.... because of state v reed, that says in nj, emails are anonomyous, unless a grand jury issues a subnpeana,.. not even a judge can break this,..... so by emailm if we can trust the police to not break that trust, and go to the injternet provider anyway,....... which they do all the time anyway,....but illegaly,...... it can be done like this
do you trust the police not to go to a cable company with an isp adress and ask for the info, and the cable company not to privide it, ,..
no one should
the police literaly hate, loath people, that complain about their actions
the police will break every law that exists to screw someone over if they have to , especialy to protect about complaints against the police
this goes back to a statement i have made in the past.
99.99999999999999999999% of the time, the government will change the rules on a dime to protect themselves
OF COURSE THERE IS A CAUSE TO SUE THEM,,,,,,,, i dont care who calls them, the police,.... no prejudice at all,...... anbyone inside the united states can call the police,....... the police do not belive in this,..... it is not rocket science to know this,.....
in the case of internal affairs complaints, which is the - nicest- way a citizen can go,...... the police and their workers,... HATE IT,..
LIKE I SAID THE OTHER NIGHT,. YOU HAVE A JOB AND ARE ASKED TO DO SOMETHING IN IT,.. ND YOU FAIL TO DO THAT JOB,.. YOU NEED TO BE FIRED, ....
WHAT COMPANY WOULD WANT AN EMPLOYEE THAT REFUSES TO DO THE JOB HE IS BEING TOLD TO DO
WE THE PEOPLE, ARE THE EMJPLOYERS OF THE GOVERNMENT
ON A LOCAL LEVEL IT IS VERY CLEAR
WE ARE ASKING THEM THROUGH GOVERNMENT FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, OF THE P[EOPLE,.... TO DO CERTAIN TASKS,.. AND OUR EMPLOYEES REFUSE TO DO THESE TASKS,.. THEY SHOULD BE FIRED WITH CAUSE,
CAN BE NO DEBATE ABOUT IT
IT WOULD BE A VICTORY TO GET A FEDERAL ASSINGMEBNT JUDSGE TO ACCEPT THE LAW SUIT AND FORCE THE STATE TO ANSWER THE MYRIAD OF POINTED QUESTIONS OUTLINED IN THE SUIT,... THAT IN OF ITSELF WOULD BE A VICTORFY TO SOMEONE LIKE ME,.. TO ACTUALY THROUGH THE LAW FORCE THEM TO ANSWER TO A COURT FOR IT,....
I HAVE A COPY OF THE AG'S POLICY,.. THE INTERNET LINK IS FROM THE STATE OF NJ, US.NJ.GOV, NO.,..... THIS IS FROM THE STATE,....... PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY,.. ANY OTHER POLICY THAT ISNT CONMSISTANT WITH THAT POLICY, IS BY DEFAULT AGAINST THE LAW,.....
I DONT HAVE TO SAY I KNOW WHAT IT IS,...... THATS THE LAW SUITSUIT, TO FIND OUT WHAT IT IS,....
THAT WOULD BE LIKE SAYING RODNEY KING NEEDED TO KNOW WHY IT WAS ILEGAL FOR THE POLICE TO BEAT THE CRAP OUT OF HIM WITH BILLY CLUBS BEFORE HE COULD FILE A LAW SUIT TIO ASK WHY,..
NOW THIS IS GOING TO THE PERSON THE OROGINALY RESPONDED, WHICH I TOOK UNBRIDGE AGAINST
IT DOESNT MATTER IF A VICTIM KNOWS WHY THE GOVERNEMENT VIOLATED HIS RIGHTS,.. WHAT MATTERS IS THAT THE GOVERNMENT DID IN FACT VIOLATE A PERSONS RIGHTS
IT DOESNT MATTEWR I DIONT THINK, ALTHOUGH I DO UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT OF VIEW, BUT IT IS MOOT,.. EVEN IF THEIR POLICY IS RIGHT IN LINE WITH THE AG'S POLICY,...... AS PER THE LAW!!!!!,.... THEN I KNOW FOR A FACT THEY ARE NBOT OBEYING IT,... IF IT IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE AG'S POLICY,.. AGAIN , THEY ARE NOT OBEYING THE LAW,.. YOU ARE REWSTING IN INTERPETATION OF THIS,.. BUTRF THE WORDING IS QUITE CLEAR IN THE AG'S POLICE AND HIS WRITTING ON THE LAW,. AS WELL AS WHAT HE SAYS ABOUT FEDERAL COURTS RUKLING MORE AND MORE ON THE SIDE OF PEOPLE THAT INIST THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE THE COMKPLAINT 24/7, 365 DAYS A YEAR\
I UNDERSTAND WHART YOU ARE SAYING, YOIU ARE NOW TALKING ABOUT A "REAL LAW" ACTION,...however,.... we alsoi know people in federal prison have wriitten out motions on toilet paper that federal judges have accepted,..
,,, what you are tyalking abnout is an individuals ability to cross all the t's dot all; the i's, , be a law expert, in order to get a court to hear a reasonable complaint,....... however, i do not agree a persons lack of ability or education in this should be taken as an overwelming negaitive that is will never get accepted .
otherwise, a whole other slew of law suits could occur on education, up to and including discrimination,...
SO YOU ARE ADMITTING THEIR IS DISCRIMINATION,...... I BELIEVE EVERYONE SHOULD BE LOOOKED AT AS THE SAME, NO DISCRIMINATION WHATSOEVER AS ANY KIND,.... A PERSON IN A FEDERAL PRISON OR COUNTY JAIL, WRITING A MOTION,... SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME A A BILLIONAIRE WITH 100 LEGAL EXPERTS WREITING A MOTION , OR FILING A SUIT,... WHAT YU ARE CONVEYING IS EXACTLY WHAT I AM FIGHTING AGAINST,......
I FEEL PRIDE I DO, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, MOST OF MY PRIDE LAYS IN THE RIGHTS OF ALL PEOPLE, EQUALLY,....... LISTEN,,..
YOU LAST SENTENCE IS UNDERSTOOD, BUT MOOT, BECAUSE THE COURTS, GOCVERMENBT, STATE, LEGISLATURE, CAN CHANGE THE RULES AT WILL TO ACCOMIDATE THEIR OWN PREJUDICES, REGARDLESS OF WHAT I DO,..
BUT AS AN AMERICAN, I HAVE THE RIGHT TO GO AFTER THEM,....... EVEN IF IT IS A FAILING ATTEMPT,..... YOUR TAKE IS THAT UNLESS YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH, YOU CANT FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS,..... THIS IS SOMETHING I FUNDMENTALY DISAGREE WITH
RIGHT, BUT THE COURTS, AGAIN, HERE WE GO ON STATUTES, HAVE TO HELP INDIVIDUALS FILE, ON ANY LEVEL, MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, STATE, OR FEDERAL,.....
I DID NOT SAY I WASNT GOOD ENOUGH, OR DIDNT MEAN TOO,.. WHAT I WAS TRYING TO CONVEY IS THAT EVERYONE IN THE UNITED STATES, BY VIRTUE OF BEING IN THE UNITED STATES, IN FUNDAMENTALY GOOD ENOUGH,.... BECAUSE THIS IS THE UNITED STATES,....
im talkingabout pratcical help, going to a court window and the court clerk instead of refusing to give you the fiorms, they have to give them to you,.. even offer you a place to sit down and fill the out in the building,... that is the help i am talkin g about
exacvtly,...... the = help---- is why they are being paid by us,...... otherwise, why pay them,.... why pay anyone in goverment that refuses to to the job they are set forth to do,...... i understand we whole thing is messed up,......... the cops plant drugs on people,.. the whole thing,..... look up camden nj cops in a goggle search of federal cases,..... come on,.... no brainer,.. we know the police are messed up, prosecutors are messed up, judges are messded it,.... no one can dispute that,..... that is a fact,........ MY POINT IS, WHEN A PERSON WELL WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS SAYS SOMETHING ABOUT IT,..... NOW EVERYONRE IN GOVERNMENT RUNS FOR GROUND, DENIES YOU YOUIR RIGHTS, AND IT SCREWS A LOT OF PEOPLE OVER,...... IN GENERAL , ISNT IS NMUCH SIMPLER FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE WORKING FOR US IN GOERBMENT TO DO WHAT WE ASK OF THEM?, SHEESH,.... COMEON MAN,.... AT SOMKE POINT IT SIMPLY DOESBNT MAKE ENSE TO A PERSON THAT PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNMENT THAT HAVE THESE JOBS, REFUE TO DO THEM S WE THEM THEM TO, AND ALL THIS LEGAL CRAP COMES US, FIGHTIONG PEOPLE OVER IT,...
I SHOULKDNT HAVE TO KNOW HOW TO FILE A FREEDOM OF INJFORMATION ACT REQUYEST TO OBTAIN MONMKOUTH COUNTYS INTERNAL AFFAIRS POLICY,... IN FACT IF I CALL RIGHT NOW, EVEN AFTER HOURS,.. THEY SHOULD HAVE SOMEONE THEIR TO SAY THEY WILL MAIL IT TO ME THE NEXT BISINESS DAY,..... THIS IDEA OF CITIZENS AND GOVERNMENT BEING AT CONTENTION WITH EACH OTHER IS CRAP,. I MEAN, TO SAY,.. ALTHOUGH IT IS HAPPENING, IT ISNT WHAT SHOULD BE HAPPENING,.....
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).