On 1-4-1982 (at age 18), I was charged with murder in the 1st degree in Alaska, AS 11.41.100(a)(1) and AS 11.16.110(2)(B). I was eventually sentenced to 60-years with 20-years suspended for 5-years. On 2-20-2002, I was paroled to Utah (my home state) under Interstate Compact. On 8-18-2005, an ex-girlfriend said that I beat her up; I honestly did not. Still, I plead on advice of counsel to 2 counts of Disorderly Conduct, 76-9-102, one which was amended to “in presence of a minor domestic violence”, both Class C Misdemeanors, and sentenced to 50-days, time served. Alaska brought me back. The Alaska Parole Board took the 3-1/2-years I had done, and started me over in January, 2006. On April 11, 2012, I successfully completed my parole. The Superior Court, on March 10, 2006, sentenced me for my Probation Violation to 6-months, time served. “The defendant is thereafter readmitted to probation according to all the terms and conditions as previously imposed…and reside at a CRC for up to 6-months.” On March 19, 2013, I filed a motion to dismiss probation due to ex post facto violation, specifically regarding that there is no provision which allows for Defendant’s readmission to Probation, which is deemed to end on 1-5-2027, or 5-6-2027, depending on who is asked. AS 33.05.070(b)[October, 1975]: “As speedily as possible after arrest the probationer shall be taken before the court for the district having jurisdiction over him. Thereupon the court may revoke the probation and require him to serve the sentence imposed, or any lesser sentence, and, if imposition of sentence was suspended, may impose any sentence which might originally have been imposed. (Section 5 ch 105 SLA 1960).” The prosecution answered today: ”Defendant seems to be arguing that pursuant to AS 33.05.070(b) that once the court found a violation of his probation and imposed 6 months of his suspended time (of which he had 20 years), then the court could not then re admit him to probation. The citing of this statute does not support his argument. Once a violation of probation is imposed, the defendant’s probation is tolled until the disposition. The court is empowered to impose any portion of the suspended sentence and then re admit the defendant to serve the remainder of his probationary term. See AS. 12.55.085.” When I looked at the prosecutor’s statute, AS 12.55.085(f) states: The court may not suspend the imposition of sentence of a person who (1) is convicted of a violation of AS 11.41.100 (Murder in the 1st Degree). Any clarification or guidance would be deeply appreciated. I just want to get on with my life. Thank You.
See: Lamkin v. State, 244 P.3d 540 (2010), deals with AS 12.55.085(f).
Thank you so much for using JustAnswer.com. I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
PLEASE NOTE WELL WE ARE DEALING WITH LAWS OF 50 STATES PLUS FEDERAL LAWS, AS WELL AS DEALING WITH OTHER CUSTOMERS, SO PLEASE BE PATIENT AND BE ASSURED YOU ARE NOT BEING IGNORED.
There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be taking a break.
You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-paulmjd/ or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”
Thank you for your answer.
I agree with you and my prosecutor that my probation could not have been suspended. How then was my original sentence suspended (60-years with 20-years suspended for 5-years), using these same rules?
And, can you help me understand this original sentence?
Thank you again.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).