I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.
If you did not get all of the information you may have wanted PLEASE USE THE REPLY TO EXPERT LINK IF YOU HAVE FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS AND NOT THE FEEDBACK BUTTON FOR BAD SERVICE. PLEASE CLICK ON “OK,” “GOOD” or “EXCELLENT” SERVICE. Kindly remember to ONLY rate my answer when you are fully satisfied. If you feel the need to rate anything less than OK, please stop and reply to me via the or REPLY TO EXPERT button with whatever issue or clarification you may need.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
PLEASE NOTE WELL WE ARE DEALING WITH LAWS OF 50 STATES PLUS FEDERAL LAWS, AS WELL AS DEALING WITH OTHER CUSTOMERS, SO PLEASE BE PATIENT AND BE ASSURED YOU ARE NOT BEING IGNORED.
There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be helping other customers or taking a break.
You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-paulmjd/ or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”
In stead of filing a motion for post conviction relief, is there any other way to reduce to misdemeanor? Write a letter to the judge?
My goal is to reduce sentence to 364 days.
I read online that I can write a letter to Judge asking to re-calendar. Is it not true?
I am opting out and referring you to another attorney, but I am afraid that wherever you are getting your information about re-calendaring without moving to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor in a motion for post conviction relief is incorrect. I wish you all of the best in this endeavor and I am sure you will get things resolved in the manner that is legally appropriate and you will get the outcome the law provides for you. Best wishes.
Hello Jacustomer,The previous attorney was correct. A theft offense is considered a crime of moral turpitude. A conviction for a crime of moral turpitude where the maximum sentence allowed by law (not what you got, but what is possible) is more than a year is a deportable offense. You can see that for yourself in the Federal Code as it relates to deportation. See 8 USC 1227 section 2 (a) which says:(2) Criminal offenses(A) General crimes(i) Crimes of moral turpitude Any alien who—(I) is convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude committed within five years (or 10 years in the case of an alien provided lawful permanent resident status under section 1255 (j) of this title) after the date of admission, and(II) is convicted of a crime for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed, is deportable.___If you have been here for more than 5 years, this matter would still keep you from leaving the US and being able to return.So as the previous expert tried to tell you, your case is much more serious than merely getting the case back on the calendar to knock a day off of your sentence. Here, the possible maximum for the crime of which you have been convicted is is 3 years of prison. So taking a day off your actual sentence doesn't mean a thing.You have already been convicted of a crime. Getting your case back on the calendar will only get you told that you will have to file a petition to reverse your conviction. You should just file that in the first place asserting that your lawyer did not apprise you of your immigration consequences when taking a felony plea to a crime of moral turpitude. That's a serious enough allegation that it would probably get you a full scale hearing where your former attorney would have to take the stand and deal with your allegation. If the judge found a violation had occurred, he would reopen your case.You would then have to go to trial or get a new lawyer to negotiate a plea to a misdmeanor or to an offense that isn't a crime of moral turpitude.
I already consulted with an immigration attorney; and based on that consultation, here is what I learned:
FranL: “A theft offense is considered a crime of moral turpitude.”
The crime at issue is “receiving stolen property”. Immigration law distinguishes a theft from receiving stolen property. Even if receiving stolen property could still be a crime involving moral turpitude, it is something my immigration attorney will deal with later; and it is certainly not the focus of my question.
FranL: “Here, the possible maximum for the crime of which you have been convicted is is 3 years of prison.”
In CALIFORNIA, which I mentioned TWICE in my question, PC 496(a) states:
496 (a) Every person who buys or receives any property that has been stolen or that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft or extortion, knowing the property to be so stolen or obtained, or who conceals, sells, withholds, or aids in concealing, selling, or withholding any property from the owner, knowing the property to be so stolen or obtained, shall be punished by imprisonment in a state prison, or in a county jail for not more than ONE year.
Thus, the possible maximum … is ONE year, not three.
FranL: ”So taking a day off your actual sentence doesn't mean a thing.”
Well, it could mean the whole world to me because it could make a difference between mandatory detention and being released on bail, which, in reality, worries me even more than deportation.
According to my immigration attorney, avoiding an aggravated felony is critical because of its severe impact such as mandatory detention pending removal. Crimes of Violence are aggravated felonies if a court imposes a sentence of imprisonment of one year or more.
My immigration attorney says that the definition of Crimes of Violence is highly arguable and heavily litigated in court. So, even before trying to argue whether receiving stolen property is a crime of violence, I should reduce the sentence to 364 days to be extra safe. A reduction to 364 days has been done in many criminal courts in California. The immigration attorney told me to contact the public defender. But I wanted to find out more on how to reduce it before speaking with the public defender.
My immigration attorney also says that the person at issue is likely deportable due to a crime involving moral turpitude; but even if he is deportable, he has several “relief” options available, which could help him stay in the US.
That is why I did not ask whether or not reducing by 1 day would help. I simply asked how to reduce it.
Instead of answering on how to reduce it, you wrongly analyzed my case with assumption of your own and gave me the wrong or, to say the least, sketchy “immigration” answers, which is not the focus of my “criminal” question.
The previous attorney “at least” answered in the proper context- criminal law. You, on the other hand, turned it around to an immigration law question; or at least devoted most of your answers to the context of immigration law.
These are good reasons for me to click on “bad service” due to “inaccurate” answers. I will not do that if you simply opt out and refer this to other criminal attorneys practicing in California.
I’m not trying to be difficult. I have never clicked on “bad service” until today. I have been giving “excellent service” or “good service” to all of the answers (more than 20) I have received on JustAnswer thus far.
All I am asking for is a proper answer. Thank you.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).