What is the legal definition of "Attempted Vehicular Assault" versus "Attempted Vehicular Homicide"? Background: My estranged wife's boyfriend attempted to run me over in the parking lot with the children in the car. I am supposed to talk to the detective tomorrow to file charges and I want to know what I am talking about. I found out that the police found it to be a disturbance and not something actionable. I have definitive proof on video.
What is the legal definition of "Attempted Vehicular Assault" versus "Attempted Vehicular Homicide"?There is no such thing. This may fall under: AGGRAVATED ASSAULT or ATTEMPTED MURDER.Aggravated Assault (a) A person commits an offense if the person: (1) intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another, including the person's spouse; (2) intentionally or knowingly threatens another with imminent bodily injury, including the person's spouse; or (3) intentionally or knowingly causes physical contact with another when the person knows or should reasonably believe that the other will regard the contact as offensive or provocative.(a) A person commits an offense if the person commits assault as defined in § 22.01 and the person: (1) causes serious bodily injury to another, including the person's spouse; or (2) uses or exhibits a deadly weapon during the commission of the assault.A car may be deemed a deadly weapon.Attempted Murder This is if the individual actually intended to kill the person.The difference is the intent of the defendant. If it can be proven that they tried to kill you, then it is attempted murder. If not, then it may still be (aggravated) assault.
Here is the video that I have as proof:
The detectives haven’t seen this yet, do you think this rises to any of the definitions?
Hello! Well, it may depend on the facts. It depends on what the DA believes and what they feel they can charge him with. Ultimately, it depends on what the jury would agree upon. So the DA charges are based on the facts, the load of his other cases, and what he thinks this should be and what 12 jurors would agree on. I think he can fall under either. In the end, it is up the DA and the jury to ultimately guess what his INTENT was, however he definitely could be charged here.
Thank you. I was wondering; why does this have to be handled by the family violence unit, and not the regular detectives?
The way it works is that several units may investigate the matter for the D.A.'s office - it may be the vice unit, the family violence unit, the drug unit, etc. It all depends on the circumstances. Each unit has their own "detectives" - there is no such thing as a "regular" detective, so to speak; they are almost always attached to a unit.
In the end, they all report to the D.A. who makes the decision about charging. Since this is family based (i.e. stemming out of family relations), it is sent to family violence by default - this is not unusual.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).