Hello, my name is Ely. Welcome to JustAnswer. Please note: (1) this is general information only, not legal advice; and (2) my function is to give you honest
information and not necessarily to tell you what you wish to hear. There may be a slight
delay between your follow ups and my replies as I reply.Your Original QuestionDo police detectives usually threaten people with arrest?
YES. It does not mean that they will do so, but they use this leverage as a way to get you to cooperate, and possibly to state whatever it is they want you to state, which may later be used against you. You see, police are allowed to lie to you
in many situations in order to get a confession or otherwise get you to do something. I am going to link you to a Youtube video from a law school lecture (do not worry, it is not dry) which you can view, and after you do so, you will have a completely different (and whole) understanding of just how manipulative police can be - see here
. You do not have to view it now, but I do recommend watching it later. This should be very helpful.
Allow me to explain how this works:The Standard Path of a Complaint
1. a complaint is made;
2. if the complaint seems credible, then the police will take her statement, and one from you (should you wish to give one - we will get to this in a second), and compile a file, which would then be passed on to the District Attorney; and
3. the D.A. decides whether or not to file charges.Reasonable Steps to Take
(if this happens again in the future)
First of all, understand that you are under no mandate to talk to the police should a complaint be made (see video). However, of course, not cooperating is seen by some as a sign of guilt. Ergo, parties in your situation may wish to retain counsel. I now that you may not wish to do this, but it may be the best step you can take. Your attorney would then make a statement if necessary with the police as to what your official version is, or, even allow for an interview, but controlled by your attorney and objections to questions and/or termination of the interview if it gets too heated is possible. This is the best bet, and it will have you give your version of the story without the possibility of being manipulated by the police, since you would be flanked by your counsel while doing so. Do not go to the police yourself, without counsel.
If the police cannot build a case, and the D.A. sees that you are being smart and have retained counsel, then they are likely to simply have the matter drop.Concluding With Follow Ups Is this how these detectives usually work with just threats and harassment?
It really is how they work. However, the police are unlikely to arrest you until the D.A. give the go-ahead signal and agrees to file charges, which may take weeks. So their threats were empty. They were trying to scare you.Or was there possibly something else behind this (maybe the detective personally knew the victim?)
It is likely that the detectives were simply being zealous in their pursuit. They wanted to scare you, corner you, and have you admit to something.Could they have had an arrest warrant with pretty much no real evidence?
This depends on the D.A. Normally, the D.A. would not file a charge unless there is some
corroborating evidence from another party, or the item was found on you at at your residence, or you have a criminal
history. Without that, it is simply your word against hers, and it is unlikely that the D.A. would have pursued this without more evidence.IMPORTANT INFO
: I hope this finds you well. Please use REPLY
button to keep chatting, or RATE
my answer when we are finished. Kindly rate my answer as one of the top three faces
, because this is how I get credit for my time with you. Rating my answer the bottom two faces does not give me credit and reflects negatively on me as an expert, even if my answer is correct. I work very hard to formulate an informative and honest answer for you; please reciprocate my good faith. Do not worry, you may always ask follow ups free after rating