Hi! I will be the professional that will be helping you today. I look forward to providing you with information to help solve your problem.
Good morning. I certainly understand your situation and concern. Was the basis for which person was thought to be impaired, a result of alcohol? Also, did they submit to a urine/blood test, which revealed the drugs stated above?
Did you recieve my response to your questions?
Yes, it was alcohol related as there was broken open container found in the vehicle.
The results of the blood alcohol was 0.032. The legal limit in Wisconsin is .08. That was the reason for the dismissal of the citation issued for DUI and she made plea guilty to attentive driving. A blood draw was made at a local hospital the same day as the accident on 09/03/2012.
The State could come back and file charges again, if they wanted to. Since the jury was never sworn in at trial nor has the statute of limitations passed, there would be nothing preventing them from doing so, if new information was discovered. However, if the basis and initial charge was alcohol related and now they try and come back and blame it on prescription drugs, their case is certainly going to be flawed, since the evidence which they initially used, had nothing to do with Benzoylecgonine. Moreover, those drugs can stay in a persons system for an extended period of time, so the presence alone, without signs of impairment related to the drug, may not be enough for them to file the charge again and proceed in good faith. Also, a plea deal was taken, so it is going to be hard for them to re-open the case and ask that the plea be vacated, since it was taken on a condition of the dismissal. The lab results being sent to her were likely part of the normal procedure and may not result in anything additional happening. In the event that it did, at that time she would want to retain counsel, since she would have to defend the charge, at that time.
Please let me know if you have any follow up questions or need any clarification on something which I stated above, prior to rating me. Also, please remember to rate my service with 3, 4, or 5 faces/stars, before exiting the site, so I can receive credit for my help. I hope you found it to be Excellent! Only rate my answer when you are 100% satisfied. If you feel the need to click either of the two faces/stars on the left, please STOP and reply to me via the "REPLY TO EXPERT or CONTINUE CONVERSATION "button. I want to make sure your experience with the site was as pleasurable as possible and that you are satisfied with the help I provided.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).