How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Lucy, Esq. Your Own Question
Lucy, Esq.
Lucy, Esq., Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 27682
Experience:  Criminal Justice Degree, JD with Criminal Law Concentration. Worked for the DA and U.S. Attorney.
26798026
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Lucy, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Post trial and conviction for a DUI in Virginia, I discovered

This answer was rated:

Post trial and conviction for a DUI in Virginia, I discovered that the instructional manual that comes with the breathalyzer clearly states that a minimum of two breath tests must be administered. I was only given one which the arresting officer admitted during trial. Can I use this new evidence? I was on the cusp and a second test might have exonerated me
Hi,

My name is XXXXX XXXXX I'd be happy to answer your questions today. Please note that you are asked to rate my courtesy and professionalism, and not whether the answer supports your legal position. I only receive credit when rated 3 or higher. If for any reason you feel that a low rating is appropriate, please first give me the opportunity to address your concerns by clicking the "reply" tab.

There may be a slight delay in response time, as I may be helping with other questions or I may be away from the computer. I will answer any follow-up questions as soon I can.

You wouldn't be able to appeal based on this information, if it wasn't raised during the original trial, because the Appeals Court isn't able to accept new evidence. In some cases, a person can file a Motion for New Trial, if additional information is discovered that could not have been discovered prior to the trial - that's an important qualifier. If you had the manual before the original trial, or you never thought to ask for it, then a judge would likely not grant a new trial on that basis. If there was some reason that you couldn't have obtained the manual before the original trial, then you might have a shot.

Keep in mind, though, that a person can be convicted of a DUI even without a breathalyser, if the testimony establishes that the person was probably driving under the influence. A person can be found to be under the influence even if below the legal limit (although he cannot, as a matter of law, be found NOT to be under the influence if over that limit). So, even if the second test might have been lower than the first, it's possible that you still would have been convicted, if the officer testified re: things such as slurred speech, red eyes, alcohol on breath, and bad driving. If you're going to try to get a new trial, you'll need to be prepared to address and refute that argument.

Please rate my service before signing out, as this is the only way that I get credit for the time I spend helping you. I hope that you are 100% satisfied - if not, please click "reply" so that we may continue the conversation. Good luck.
Lucy, Esq. and 2 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related Criminal Law Questions