How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jim Reilly Your Own Question

Jim Reilly
Jim Reilly, Crim Defense Atty
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 1801
Experience:  CA Atty since 1976, primarily criminal law. 150+ jury trials.
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Jim Reilly is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

If I go to the California Supreme Court regarding the Writ,

Resolved Question:

If I go to the California Supreme Court regarding the Writ, do I need to go there or can I mail it?
Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Criminal Law
Expert:  Jim Reilly replied 2 years ago.
HelloCustomerand welcome back to JustAnswer.I have looked at your other questions but don't see anything that relates to a writ of Habeas corpus, so I'm not clear on what you are asking about. Are you trying to find out how to file a petition for a writ of Habeas corpus in the Supreme Court?Has the case already been heard by the District Court of Appeal?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

This is a Writ of Mandate or Prohibition regarding a Denial of Motion to Sever. It was denied at the Fifth Circuit and now I am Appealing it to the California Supreme Court....

Customer: replied 2 years ago.
You previously commented that my cases were misjoindered in November. I'm still trying to sever them.
Expert:  Jim Reilly replied 2 years ago.
Hello againCustomer

I have figured out what happened -- you now have a different customer name. Therefore, when I looked up your questions under the new name, those under your old name (including the ones to which I responded) did not show up. I was, however, able to go back through my own questions and find my previous responses to you.

All of the Rules of Court which apply in the California Supreme Court are available online here:

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight

If you are asking only about getting the appeal filed, it can be done by mail (or messenger), but there is some risk in doing it that way. If for any reason your paperwork is not in accordance with the court rules, it will be returned unfiled (see Rule 8.18). If you take it in personally, at least then you will know immediately if there is a problem and can perhaps get it fixed quickly.

Thanks again for asking your question here on JustAnswer.
Jim Reilly, Crim Defense Atty
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 1801
Experience: CA Atty since 1976, primarily criminal law. 150+ jury trials.
Jim Reilly and 5 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Thanks. The lower court was hesitant at firs and asked questions and dismissed without prejudice, suggesting that I wait until after prelim. Then I renewed, showing them that the DA was using the two unrelated charges as leverage in order to get a settlement in their favor. They denied without further comment, wich led me to this appeal. I think that the fact that they had questions and were reluctant to outright dismiss it initially means it is ripe for appeal. As you stated before, this is a clear case of misjoindering. What do you think?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
On expert said that I am being "hard lined" because I have now added hard evidence of an extotion attempt by the alleged victim and the da still won't dismiss the case? I have however manged to keep them at bey for a year now.....
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Is the actual appeal due in ten days, or simply a notice of appeal? The state capitol is over two hours away and I'm still working on the breif....sorry for so many questions....
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
I also just learned from the Supreme Court Clerk that the ten day rule does not apply to writs of mandate or prohibition....?
Expert:  Jim Reilly replied 2 years ago.
Hello again ccdc. Was away at court today and just back online here. Will catch up on your questions:

The lower court was hesitant at firs and asked questions and dismissed without prejudice, suggesting that I wait until after prelim. Then I renewed, showing them that the DA was using the two unrelated charges as leverage in order to get a settlement in their favor. They denied without further comment, wich led me to this appeal. I think that the fact that they had questions and were reluctant to outright dismiss it initially means it is ripe for appeal. As you stated before, this is a clear case of misjoindering. What do you think?


By "lower court" here I assume you mean the district court of appeal (just FYI, appellate lawyers and justices typically use the term "lower court" to refer to the trial court and "appellate court" or "DCA" to refer to the court of appeal). I'm not sure why the court would have suggested waiting until after the prelim -- if the charges are improperly joined, they are improperly joined both pre- and post-prelim. Perhaps they had in mind the fact that you could challenge the improper joinder by way of a 995 motion after prelim.

It is always tricky trying to read into the minds of the justices when they make a ruling without an explanation. I wouldn't make too much of the fact that they initially seemed reluctant to dismiss outright.

On expert said that I am being "hard lined" because I have now added hard evidence of an extotion attempt by the alleged victim and the da still won't dismiss the case? I have however manged to keep them at bey for a year now.....

Whoever said that was probably right -- sometimes a particular DA will get an "attitude" about a particular defendant, for whatever reason, and will handle a case differently than it would normally be handled. It is of course also possible that the particular DA involved has a good faith belief in what (s)he is being told by the alleged victim and is being hard-nosed for that reason. Nevertheless, as I mentioned in my original responses to your questions, the joinder here is of highly questionable validity.

Is the actual appeal due in ten days, or simply a notice of appeal? The state capitol is over two hours away and I'm still working on the breif....sorry for so many questions.... I also just learned from the Supreme Court Clerk that the ten day rule does not apply to writs of mandate or prohibition....?


Technically, seeking review of a decision by the DCA, the filing in the Supreme Court is called a "petition for review" rather than an "appeal". You can see the rules for such petitions here (California Rules of Court, Rule 8.500):

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_500

Note that the ten day rule is in subdivision (c) of Rule 8.500 and applies from the date the DCA decision is final (which is typically 30 days after it is announced). The ten day rule applies to the filing of the petition for review. See Rule of Court 5.504, subd. (b), for what must be field with a petition for review:

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_504

On the other hand, a writ petition can be filed directly in the Supreme Court, rather than seeking review of the DCA order. See Rule of Court 8.485 here:

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_485

What the clerk is referring to is that you can file a petition for a writ of mandate directly to the Supreme Court and such a filing would not be subject to the ten day rule (because it is an original petition rather than a petition for review). The rules for filing such a petition are in Rule of Court 8.486, which you can see here:

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_486

Note the requirement in subdivision (a)(1) of this rule regarding filing in the lower court (that is, the DCA). If filing an original petition for writ, you have to explain what happened in the DCA when you filed there.

Here is a link to the index for Title Eight of the Rules of Court, which includes all of the provisions I liked above, as well as all other appellate rules applicable in the courts of appeal and the supreme court. You can navigate to any of the individual rules from this page:

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight


Thanks for accepting the previous answer. If you have any more questions about this, please let me know.
Jim Reilly, Crim Defense Atty
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 1801
Experience: CA Atty since 1976, primarily criminal law. 150+ jury trials.
Jim Reilly and 5 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Your Expert advise has provided insight on a difficult situation. Thank you so much for the prompt response. I will definitely recommend your website to my friends. Norma Pensacola, FL
< Last | Next >
  • Your Expert advise has provided insight on a difficult situation. Thank you so much for the prompt response. I will definitely recommend your website to my friends. Norma Pensacola, FL
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Fran L.

    JustAnswer Criminal Law Mentor

    Satisfied Customers:

    8061
    18 yrs of NYC public defense. Extensive arraignment, hearing, trial experience.
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RE/retiredlawyer/2012-6-6_19326_franL.64x64.jpg Fran L.'s Avatar

    Fran L.

    JustAnswer Criminal Law Mentor

    Satisfied Customers:

    8061
    18 yrs of NYC public defense. Extensive arraignment, hearing, trial experience.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RA/ratioscripta/2012-6-13_2955_foto3.64x64.jpg Ely's Avatar

    Ely

    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    2079
    Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/NA/nathanmoorelaw/2011-5-31_21375_headshotbig.64x64.jpg Nate's Avatar

    Nate

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1625
    Over 10 years of criminal defense practice.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/LA/LawTalk/2012-6-6_17379_LawTalk.64x64.JPG LawTalk's Avatar

    LawTalk

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1434
    30 years legal experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/PH/philip.simmons/2012-6-7_161915_BIGPhilipSimmons.64x64.jpg P. Simmons's Avatar

    P. Simmons

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1418
    16 yrs. of experience including criminal law.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/marshadjd/2009-6-1_194320_marshajd.jpg Marsha411JD's Avatar

    Marsha411JD

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1380
    Licensed attorney with 27 yrs. exp. in criminal law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RO/RobertJDFL/2012-6-6_175352_7538220120606.64x64.jpg RobertJDFL's Avatar

    RobertJDFL

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1300
    Experienced in multiple areas of the law.