If I go to the California Supreme Court regarding the Writ, do I need to go there or can I mail it?
HelloCustomerand welcome back to JustAnswer.I have looked at your other questions but don't see anything that relates to a writ of Habeas corpus, so I'm not clear on what you are asking about. Are you trying to find out how to file a petition for a writ of Habeas corpus in the Supreme Court?Has the case already been heard by the District Court of Appeal?RunTam38 CA Lawyer41021.1000640394
This is a Writ of Mandate or Prohibition regarding a Denial of Motion to Sever. It was denied at the Fifth Circuit and now I am Appealing it to the California Supreme Court....
You previously commented that my cases were misjoindered in November. I'm still trying to sever them.
Hello againCustomerI have figured out what happened -- you now have a different customer name. Therefore, when I looked up your questions under the new name, those under your old name (including the ones to which I responded) did not show up. I was, however, able to go back through my own questions and find my previous responses to you.All of the Rules of Court which apply in the California Supreme Court are available online here:http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eightIf you are asking only about getting the appeal filed, it can be done by mail (or messenger), but there is some risk in doing it that way. If for any reason your paperwork is not in accordance with the court rules, it will be returned unfiled (see Rule 8.18). If you take it in personally, at least then you will know immediately if there is a problem and can perhaps get it fixed quickly.Thanks again for asking your question here on JustAnswer.
Thanks. The lower court was hesitant at firs and asked questions and dismissed without prejudice, suggesting that I wait until after prelim. Then I renewed, showing them that the DA was using the two unrelated charges as leverage in order to get a settlement in their favor. They denied without further comment, wich led me to this appeal. I think that the fact that they had questions and were reluctant to outright dismiss it initially means it is ripe for appeal. As you stated before, this is a clear case of misjoindering. What do you think?
On expert said that I am being "hard lined" because I have now added hard evidence of an extotion attempt by the alleged victim and the da still won't dismiss the case? I have however manged to keep them at bey for a year now.....
Is the actual appeal due in ten days, or simply a notice of appeal? The state capitol is over two hours away and I'm still working on the breif....sorry for so many questions....
I also just learned from the Supreme Court Clerk that the ten day rule does not apply to writs of mandate or prohibition....?
Hello again ccdc. Was away at court today and just back online here. Will catch up on your questions:The lower court was hesitant at firs and asked questions and dismissed without prejudice, suggesting that I wait until after prelim. Then I renewed, showing them that the DA was using the two unrelated charges as leverage in order to get a settlement in their favor. They denied without further comment, wich led me to this appeal. I think that the fact that they had questions and were reluctant to outright dismiss it initially means it is ripe for appeal. As you stated before, this is a clear case of misjoindering. What do you think? By "lower court" here I assume you mean the district court of appeal (just FYI, appellate lawyers and justices typically use the term "lower court" to refer to the trial court and "appellate court" or "DCA" to refer to the court of appeal). I'm not sure why the court would have suggested waiting until after the prelim -- if the charges are improperly joined, they are improperly joined both pre- and post-prelim. Perhaps they had in mind the fact that you could challenge the improper joinder by way of a 995 motion after prelim. It is always tricky trying to read into the minds of the justices when they make a ruling without an explanation. I wouldn't make too much of the fact that they initially seemed reluctant to dismiss outright.On expert said that I am being "hard lined" because I have now added hard evidence of an extotion attempt by the alleged victim and the da still won't dismiss the case? I have however manged to keep them at bey for a year now..... Whoever said that was probably right -- sometimes a particular DA will get an "attitude" about a particular defendant, for whatever reason, and will handle a case differently than it would normally be handled. It is of course also possible that the particular DA involved has a good faith belief in what (s)he is being told by the alleged victim and is being hard-nosed for that reason. Nevertheless, as I mentioned in my original responses to your questions, the joinder here is of highly questionable validity.Is the actual appeal due in ten days, or simply a notice of appeal? The state capitol is over two hours away and I'm still working on the breif....sorry for so many questions.... I also just learned from the Supreme Court Clerk that the ten day rule does not apply to writs of mandate or prohibition....?Technically, seeking review of a decision by the DCA, the filing in the Supreme Court is called a "petition for review" rather than an "appeal". You can see the rules for such petitions here (California Rules of Court, Rule 8.500):http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_500Note that the ten day rule is in subdivision (c) of Rule 8.500 and applies from the date the DCA decision is final (which is typically 30 days after it is announced). The ten day rule applies to the filing of the petition for review. See Rule of Court 5.504, subd. (b), for what must be field with a petition for review:http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_504On the other hand, a writ petition can be filed directly in the Supreme Court, rather than seeking review of the DCA order. See Rule of Court 8.485 here:http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_485What the clerk is referring to is that you can file a petition for a writ of mandate directly to the Supreme Court and such a filing would not be subject to the ten day rule (because it is an original petition rather than a petition for review). The rules for filing such a petition are in Rule of Court 8.486, which you can see here:http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_486Note the requirement in subdivision (a)(1) of this rule regarding filing in the lower court (that is, the DCA). If filing an original petition for writ, you have to explain what happened in the DCA when you filed there.Here is a link to the index for Title Eight of the Rules of Court, which includes all of the provisions I liked above, as well as all other appellate rules applicable in the courts of appeal and the supreme court. You can navigate to any of the individual rules from this page:http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eightThanks for accepting the previous answer. If you have any more questions about this, please let me know.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).