Please understand that the policies of Just Answer prohibit us from stating definitively that a motion to dismiss would absolutely be granted. Similarly, the ethical rules of the Bar Association would prohibit such a statement as well. With that in mind...
I would suggest that your analysis is accurate. As you have outlined, the statute under which your friend is charged requires the use of a "hypodermic or syringe". Your friend though, was apparently charged while possessing a smoking device. As a smoking device is neither a "hypodermice" or a "syringe", a motion to dismiss would seem prudent.
As a note, your friend should also keep in mind that a violation of 2925.12 is a second degree misdemeanor. Meaning, the charge is rather minor and the penalties are typically rather lenient. Additionally, the mere filing of the motion may encourage the prosecutor to make a rather reasonable offer.
Please let me know if anything requires clarification.
Also, several customers have asked how they may direct a question to me in particular. If you specifically want me to assist you in your legal matter, just put "FOR JOSEPH" in the subject line and I will gladly pick up the question as soon as I am on-line.
I really appreciate your input. I have one last question and I will gladly accept your answer. Are there different types of motions to dismiss in criminal cases? For example, could the court grant the motion to dismiss but allow the prosecutor to amend the charges to accurately reflect the evidence? Will double jeopardy be an appropriate defense against new charges?
It is theoretically possible for a motion to dismiss to be granted and for the prosecutor to then come in and file a different charge. Having said that, I would suggest that such a result would be unusual.
When a prosecutor files a charge, it is his ethical obligation to file all relevant charges and to only file charges that he believes he can prove in court beyond a reasonable doubt. Meaning, if a motion to dismiss were granted as to the filed charges, then there should not be any charge remaining that the prosecutor believes to be appropriate.
As to "different types" of motions to dismiss, one might file a motion to dismiss arguing that the allegations do not arise to the level of a crime, or that the statute of limitations ran before charges were filed, or that there was prosecutorial misconduct or that jeopardy had already attached in a previous case. These are all examples that come to mind.
While I do not have statistical data available and I have never conducted a scientific survey, I would suggest that new charges are filed after a successful motion to dismiss less than 10% of the time. As a general rule, a successful motion to dismiss will effectively end the case.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).