It is theoretically possible for a motion to dismiss to be granted and for the prosecutor to then come in and file a different charge. Having said that, I would suggest that such a result would be unusual.
When a prosecutor files a charge, it is his ethical obligation to file all relevant charges and to only file charges that he believes he can prove in court beyond a reasonable doubt. Meaning, if a motion to dismiss were granted as to the filed charges, then there should not be any charge remaining that the prosecutor believes to be appropriate.
As to "different types" of motions to dismiss, one might file a motion to dismiss arguing that the allegations do not arise to the level of a crime, or that the statute of limitations ran before charges were filed, or that there was prosecutorial misconduct or that jeopardy had already attached in a previous case. These are all examples that come to mind.
While I do not have statistical data available and I have never conducted a scientific survey, I would suggest that new charges are filed after a successful motion to dismiss less than 10% of the time. As a general rule, a successful motion to dismiss will effectively end the case.
Also, several customers have asked how they may direct a question to me in particular. If you specifically want me to assist you in your legal matter, just put "FOR JOSEPH" in the subject line and I will gladly pick up the question as soon as I am on-line.