How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Ely Your Own Question
Ely
Ely, Counselor at Law
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 3057
Experience:  Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
7286322
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Ely is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

—PREVIOUS MESSAGE UNANSWERED.--- If a Judge dismiss my case

Customer Question

—PREVIOUS MESSAGE UNANSWERED.---

If a Judge dismiss my case due to taint of a Kastigar hearing, which becomes case law, without prejudice and another jurisdiction takes the case and has to conduct their own Kastigar hearing and the same type of result results (dismissal without prejudice)...Can they ring around the rosy and try as many jurisdictions that they are allowed to?

--None reasonable answer
Ok. I understand your answer. Yet, it still doesn't answer my question.

If a Federal Judge rules against the Prosecution for failing to meet the burden of proof in a Kastigar hearing and he/she dismisses the case without prejudice because the entire district that handled my case has been tainted. (1% of Judges dismiss with prejudice).

How can an entirely new jurisdiction decide to take my case and prosecute me if the simple "dye in the water" was exposed in the original Kastigar hearing. My understanding from Kastigar vs U.S. Supreme Court is that you can not "rely on the good faith and testimony from a Prosecutor".

If you can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a "wall was formed" in order to protect the testimonial immunity then you can not meet the burden.

If the Judge's rules that the CASE and not the EVIDENCE was tainted...How do you prove that all witness were not in a pool where a droplet of dye was place from the previous prosecution?
Submitted: 4 years ago.
Category: Criminal Law
Expert:  Fran-mod replied 4 years ago.
Hi, I’m a moderator for this topic and I wonder whether you’re still waiting for an answer. If you are, please let me know and I will do my best to find an Expert to assist you right away. If not, feel free to let me know and I will cancel this question for you. Thank you!
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Still waiting for the question to be answered :\
Expert:  Fran-mod replied 4 years ago.
Sometimes, finding the right Expert can take a little longer than expected and we thank you greatly for your understanding. We’ll be in touch again shortly.

Related Criminal Law Questions