"Even if it could be proved, that also would have to be done by way of a writ, because new evidence cannot be entered in an appeal proceeding." Ok. But it will no, because it is not void but only abuse of discretion and I did not show, way the remade will not on appeal= just is proceeded against the RULE of mandamus. Are thre possibilities for writ of mandamus to lie again with an argument I have encountered it after time for appeal, was gone.
JIM,It is clear, as you say, that the stolen car has no title, and not after as with the defense argument of the registration in Georgia is mislied due to lack of local protection for the thief. is the normal law to prevail would be returniert car to the rightful owners .. This has dealt against the law, by the ticking of Entrastment and my attorney has approved it. The whole defense construction is planned to deceive the court. he have again the protective law of private buyers taken for defense, to get voidable because of fraud he made: to bring the car to the shipper, however, if this should work, expo would have to sign my Ressignment asSeller to Expo. Voidable title can thus no longer be repaired to good title; I have also demanded return of the car as at this moment. But now the most important is have to discuss the application of the UCC and without the evidence and arguments at appeal which is dismiss, of the court to conclude otherwise would hardly be expected defrent result. In case was no creation of voidable title and no protection for Expo brought; no private buyer , it is much better to fight. Here, only timeless potition for mandamus must law corrects, without time limit. So I think .that is acceptable even if mandamus is approved in cause for dissmissal untimely appellation, one must ask mandamus in the Supreme Court.Please your opinion for the appeal and mandamus.? Can be the facts adapt to UCC, where he established the defense can it not qualify as a court of fraud by lawyer?Thank you.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).