Hi - my name is Kirk and I'm a Criminal Law litigation attorney here to assist you.
The legal definition of Stalking is found in SC Code Ann. § 16-3-1700
(C) "Stalking" means a pattern of words, whether verbal, written, or electronic, or a pattern of conduct that serves no legitimate purpose and is intended to cause and does cause a targeted person and would cause a reasonable person in the targeted person's position to fear:
(1) death of the person or a member of his family;
(2) assault upon the person or a member of his family;
(3) bodily injury to the person or a member of his family;
(4) criminal sexual contact on the person or a member of his family;
(5) kidnapping of the person or a member of his family; or
(6) damage to the property of the person or a member of his family.
Thus, it is not a defense that there was previous mutual contact before. However, it is required that the person prove one of these 6 elements to sustain a charge of stalking.
No, because the fear could have been a result of the mutual contact.
The only two cited cases in the annotations to the statute state:
Defendant's conviction for aggravated stalking under S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-1700(C) was upheld. The requisite act of violence to support defendant's conviction encompassed acts against property as well as against persons. State v. Prince, 335 S.C. 466, 517 S.E.2d 229, 1999 S.C. App. LEXIS 61 (S.C. Ct. App. 1999).2. Defendant's conviction for aggravated stalking, under S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-1700(C) was upheld. A pattern of conduct causing fear of "damage to the property of the person" was sufficient to support a stalking charge under the statute. State v. Prince, 335 S.C. 466, 517 S.E.2d 229, 1999 S.C. App. LEXIS 61 (S.C. Ct. App. 1999).
I don't see anything that exculpates one from being charged with stalking because of a previous mutual consent to contact.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).