How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question

Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 90419
Experience:  Attorney with over 20 years law enforcement, prosecution, civil rights and defense experience
10285032
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Law Educator, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Criminal Justice

Customer Question

1. In United States v. Robinson, the Supreme Court recognized
that justification for a lawful arrest
A. doesn’t need to be specific.
B. must include all probable contraband being searched for.
C. is sufficient for a search.
D. isn’t sufficient for a search.
2. In Illinois v. Rodriguez, the Supreme Court ruled that permission
given by a third person to law enforcement officers to
conduct a warrantless search would be
A. valid if the third person reasonably believes that he or
she has that authority, even if he or she doesn’t.
B. invalid because the third person doesn’t have the authority.
C. valid because the third person has the authority.
D. invalid because warrantless searches of third parties
are illegal.
3. Consent to a warrantless search of an apartment may be given by
A. the landlord.
B. the tenant.
C. either the landlord or tenant.
D. a keyholder to the apartment’s front door.
4. According to Bumper v. Rodriguez, consent to search a premises
A. is legal even if the officer claims authority he or she doesn’t have.
B. must be freely and voluntarily given.
C. must be obtained within three hours of the search.
D. can’t be withdrawn.
5. There’s no voluntary consent to a search when
A. an officer tells a suspect he’s going to get a warrant.
B. the spouse authorizes the search.
C. an officer claims that the occupant doesn’t have a right to resist the search.
D. only one member of a four-person household authorizes the search.
6. Based on the plain view doctrine, there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy when it
comes to
A. checkbooks. C. cellphones.
B. binoculars. D. VIN numbers.
7. If officers stop a vehicle and then develop reasonable suspicion that the occupants of
the car are armed and dangerous, they may then
A. arrest the occupants of the car.
B. call for a warrant to frisk the occupants.
C. frisk the occupants and conduct a limited search of the car.
D. search the car in its entirety.
8. According to Minnesota v. Dickerson, if contraband inside a suspect’s pockets isn’t
apparent during a pat-down search, the officer
A. may not further manipulate the pocket.
B. may manipulate the package to identify it.
C. must ask the suspect to empty his or her pockets.
D. must tell the suspect to empty his or her pockets.
9. If law enforcement officers have probable cause to search a specific container in a
vehicle, they
A. may search the container but not the entire vehicle.
B. must request consent to search the container.
C. may search the entire vehicle.
D. must apply for a warrant to search.
10. After a vehicle is impounded, law enforcement officers
A. may search the car for contraband.
B. may conduct an inventory search.
C. must contact the owner for consent to search.
D. may do nothing but hold the vehicle for safekeeping.
Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Criminal Law
Expert:  Law Educator, Esq. replied 3 years ago.
3) Tenant

4) Is legal even if the officer claims he has authority he does or does not have.

5) When the officer claims the occupant has no right to refuse.

6) Vin Numbers

7) Frisk occupants and conduct limited search.

8) May not further manipulate the object

9) Must apply for a warrant

10) Conduct an inventory search


If you have additional questions, please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be helping other customers or taking a break.

You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/profile.aspx?PF=10285032&FID=39 or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”

Law Educator, Esq., Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 90419
Experience: Attorney with over 20 years law enforcement, prosecution, civil rights and defense experience
Law Educator, Esq. and 12 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 3 years ago.
Sorry can you answer these last two

1. In United States v. Robinson, the Supreme Court recognized
that justification for a lawful arrest
A. doesn’t need to be specific.
B. must include all probable contraband being searched for.
C. is sufficient for a search.
D. isn’t sufficient for a search.
2. In Illinois v. Rodriguez, the Supreme Court ruled that permission
given by a third person to law enforcement officers to
conduct a warrantless search would be
A. valid if the third person reasonably believes that he or
she has that authority, even if he or she doesn’t.
B. invalid because the third person doesn’t have the authority.
C. valid because the third person has the authority.
D. invalid because warrantless searches of third parties
are illegal.
Expert:  Law Educator, Esq. replied 3 years ago.
1) Is sufficient for a search

2) Valid if the authority is reasonably believed (A)


If you have additional questions, please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be helping other customers or taking a break.

You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/profile.aspx?PF=10285032&FID=39 or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”



2)
Law Educator, Esq., Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 90419
Experience: Attorney with over 20 years law enforcement, prosecution, civil rights and defense experience
Law Educator, Esq. and 12 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Your Expert advise has provided insight on a difficult situation. Thank you so much for the prompt response. I will definitely recommend your website to my friends. Norma Pensacola, FL
< Last | Next >
  • Your Expert advise has provided insight on a difficult situation. Thank you so much for the prompt response. I will definitely recommend your website to my friends. Norma Pensacola, FL
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Fran L.

    JustAnswer Criminal Law Mentor

    Satisfied Customers:

    8061
    18 yrs of NYC public defense. Extensive arraignment, hearing, trial experience.
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RE/retiredlawyer/2012-6-6_19326_franL.64x64.jpg Fran L.'s Avatar

    Fran L.

    JustAnswer Criminal Law Mentor

    Satisfied Customers:

    8061
    18 yrs of NYC public defense. Extensive arraignment, hearing, trial experience.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RA/ratioscripta/2012-6-13_2955_foto3.64x64.jpg Ely's Avatar

    Ely

    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    2079
    Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/NA/nathanmoorelaw/2011-5-31_21375_headshotbig.64x64.jpg Nate's Avatar

    Nate

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1625
    Over 10 years of criminal defense practice.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/LA/LawTalk/2012-6-6_17379_LawTalk.64x64.JPG LawTalk's Avatar

    LawTalk

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1434
    30 years legal experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/PH/philip.simmons/2012-6-7_161915_BIGPhilipSimmons.64x64.jpg P. Simmons's Avatar

    P. Simmons

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1418
    16 yrs. of experience including criminal law.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/marshadjd/2009-6-1_194320_marshajd.jpg Marsha411JD's Avatar

    Marsha411JD

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1380
    Licensed attorney with 27 yrs. exp. in criminal law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RO/RobertJDFL/2012-6-6_175352_7538220120606.64x64.jpg RobertJDFL's Avatar

    RobertJDFL

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    1300
    Experienced in multiple areas of the law.