Criminal Law Questions? Ask a Criminal Lawyer.
Exactly what constititutes a speedy trial. On one occasion the lawyer forgot the court date. On the other the rumour was that he was drunk. Does requesting a new lawyer do away with the speedy trial part? We live in a small town. The "good ole boy" system is very much alive and well.
First and foremost, thank you for choosing justanswer.com. I am a licensed criminal defense attorney and member of the American Bar Association.
The "speedy trial" in Texas is quite a lucid concept. The speedy trial is defined by the Texas courts as follows under the four-factor balancing test set out in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), which requires balancing the following factors: (1) length of delay, (2) reason for delay, (3) assertion of the right, and (4) prejudice.
Obviously, your brother in law would have an argument that his "speedy trial" rights were abused due to his attorney's seemingly incompetent performance. Of course, this would depend upon whether or not there is actual hard proof his attorney has "forgotten" court dates or has simply been too "drunk" to show up.
The above could be hard to prove to a Texas Appellate court. Also, you have to consider the time it would take to follow through the trial process with the current attorney, and actually get to the appellate process.
The best move would be for your brother in law to have a motion filed for change of counsel. The most important evidence would be the change of court dates without any particular reason by his attorney. Your brother in law's attorney would have to answer for the reasons the continuances were filed and, assuming your accusations are correct, there should be be enough reason for a change of counsel to be granted.
You ask if requesting a new trial would do away with the speedy trial right: the answer is yes and no. Requesting new counsel does not due away with the speedy trial right; that right is absolute. However, any continuance granted for your brother in law to obtain new counsel, private or court appointed, would run against him. Still . . . the benefit of a competent attorney will outweigh the time spent in obtaining one.
I hope this helps. Please, click "Accept" if you found my answer helpful. Do not hesitate to ask follow up questions after accepting my answer as I will be more than happy to offer further help. Thank you in advance and good luck to you and your brother in law!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).