Hello again TexCrimLawyer, I received a letter in the mail from my attorney, who sat down with ADA a couple of days ago.
*** ADA said he is not sure what additional evidence is from crime lab
*** ADA said additional charges are from 'more extensive search'
***ADA informed him that they did an examination to determine whether the procedure
that the hard drive erases itself every 2 weeks was done on my computer.( I have no idea what that is referring to or is.)
*** ADA admitted that the testimony from the officers is "not tremendous"
*** ADA admitted that there are some "internal inconsistencies" and problems with my
*** ADA has offered resolution of a plea to 5 counts of 943.70(2) (a) 4. A person guilty of this willfully, knowingly, and without authorization takes possession of computer data, computer programs or supporting documents.( I have no idea what that means or how it pertains to me.)
***ADA would ask that I be convicted and placed on probation for 3 years so that I could be monitored(why would I need to be monitored??). My attorney assumes that
three years are negotiable.
****ADA would not be asking for jail time
**** this accomplishes ada goals (a conviction?) and he assumes ours??
My attorney has also informed me i the letter that he has not yet taken another look at the original discovery to see whether the new charges are in it. I contend that they are.
I believe that they have not been conducted a 'more extensive' search' because 'new'
files are in the original discovery.
IS this something you have ever offered instead of felony pleas? I don't see a judge
going for this. I knew he had no intentions of taking this to trial
. This further cements to me that the refiling is retaliatory, which I am assuming form my attorneys letter, he has not yet brought up. Is this enough detail? I have received no further detail. thanks