This question, like most legal questions is not a black and white issue. Nobody believes that a sexual predator should have unrestrained access to young children. However, the sex crime statutes and registration requirements as presently constituted are overbroad, and they catch all sorts of people who aren't in that league, bring shame to their families, restrict their housing and their ability to earn a viable living. Many of the low-level so-called sex offenses is what another generation would consider normal experimentation between two dating teenagers, for example.
It's not a particularly popular position in this day and age where everything that used to be considered a rite of passage has become a zero tolerance crime to be anti-registration. But I believe that most criminal defense attorneys would agree with me that as they are presently written and enforced, the registration requirements probably do more harm than good.
Along with registering with local law officials, do you think there is anything else that an offender should have to do to remain compliant with all of the legalities of their conviction?
Do you feel in your opinion, that if the punishment for those convicted was more severe, it would be a deterrant to repeated offensese?
If they are at liberty, they are on probation or parole. That means that there are conditions that they have to comply with that are designed to help keep them from reoffending. Those conditions are made on a case-by-case basis, as they are with all offenders regardless of the nature of the offense. Parole or probation determines these by looking at a defendant's history, criminal and otherwise, and the particular nature of his case. With sex offenders, it has become customary for parolees to submit to lie detector tests to determine if they are doing anything improper. This is not something generally done with other types of offenses, and it is very controversial, though it has been upheld.
I'm leaving momentarily to walk my dogs but will be back within 15 minutes.
I am not a proponent of lie detector tests under these circumstances. But the standard parole and probation conditions sit reasonably well with me.
I am back irf there was anything further that you wanted to ask.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).