Under 18 USC sec 1030(a)(5)(B)(i), a person subject to an identity theft associated with a computer system that causes more than an aggregate loss of $5,000 during any one-year period, has a private right of action against the purpetrator.
Unfortunately, there is no right to punitive damages under the law -- only recovery of the lost money is permitted.
You could sue for the common law tort of "misappropriation of identity," but as you have already recovered your money, your right to punitive damages, in the absence of any compensatory damages, could be quite limited. But, you could try it in small claims court and ask for the jurisdictional maximum. Maybe the judge would award punitive damages, despite your having only nominal general damages.
Hope this helps.
Terms and Conditions: By your continuing in this conversation with me, or by your clicking “Accept”, you are expressly agreeing to all of the following: (1) our communication is for entertainment purposes only; (2) you are not consulting me in my professional capacity as an attorney; (3) you do not seek to establish an attorney-client relationship with me, nor do I with you; (4) you will not rely on anything I say and you will obtain appropriate legal counsel via a traditional/office consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where your legal issue arises (and you may not use our communication to avoid taxpayer penalties imposed by the U.S. Dept. of Treasury); (5) by communicating with me in this public forum you are irrevocably waiving any right to privacy, confidentiality and attorney-client privilege concerning the matters discussed. You further separately declare that any payment made by you is not consideration for this contract, nor offered for any services rendered by me on your behalf, but rather is made in genuine admiration and respect for my desire to help others. If you do not agree with these terms and conditions, then you must advise me immediately.
Employers are "vicariously liable" for the acts and omissions of employees when undertaken "within the scope of employment." If you sue the employer, you would have to prove this element, and the employer would probably argue that it's ridiculous to think that your ex's action was somehow part of the job description.
That said, you can always sue the employer, and if it's a big enough company, maybe it won't show up -- because big companies are frequently pretty arrogant about defening small claims actions. In which case, you could get a default against the employer and collect even if the employer wouldn't have otherwise been liable.
If you sue in regular court, the employer will show up by attorney and I believe your claim against the employer would ultimately fail.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).