it would not be entrapment unless you can prove that you would never have committed the crime, if this person did not contact you and "lure" you into the crime. entrapment occurs if the conduct of the investigating officers or their agents in dealing with the defendant would "likely" have induced a "normally law-abiding person" to commit the crime with which the defendant was charged
entrapment occurs if the defendant committed the crime as the result of an officer's threats or other pressure such as badgering, coaxing, cajoling, or importuning. for example, if the defendant a recovering addict with a steady job, sold to an undercover police agent only because, (1) the agent telephoned him repeatedly at work; (2) he was afraid he would lose his job if the agent kept calling, so he agreed to meet and (3) during the meeting, which lasted more than an hour, the agent "importuned him relentlessly until his resistance was worn down and overcome."
entrapment also occurs if the conduct of the officers would have generated in the mind of a normally law-abiding person an unusual and compelling motive to commit the crime - for example, entrapment may result if an officer persuaded the defendant to commit the crime as an act of friendship or sympathy instead of a desire for personal gain or some other common criminal motive.
entrapment does not result merely because officers created a situation which made it possible for the defendant to commit the crime - this is because it is presumed that a normally law-abiding person would resist the temptation to commit a crime if officers did nothing more than give him an opportunity to do so. consequently, it is not entrapment to employ undercover officers or agents to pose as drug sellers, drug buyers, prostitutes, or johns
courts have ruled the following:
"[T]he rule is clear that ruses, stings, and decoys are permissible stratagems in the enforcement of criminal law, and they become invalid only when badgering or importuning takes place to an extent and degree that is likely to induce an otherwise law-abiding person to commit a crime"
and you can be charged with anything - but the state must prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).