How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask jamest Your Own Question
jamest
jamest, Private Investigator
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 372
Experience:  Investigator of criminal law cases, especially Florida law. Work with retailers, others, consultant
7502674
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
jamest is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

2-Level Under 3B1.1 (c)!!!!!!!

This answer was rated:

Its there any case Law citing that a 2-level enchancement under 3B1.1 (c) shouldnt be granted,because the period of supervision was relatively brief compared to the duration of the conspiracy (Federal Court Law)
You are in the 3rd judicial circuit, and the rulings of the 3rd circuit apply to your case. After quite a bit of reading, I was only able to find one decision which limits the application of guideline factor 3b1.1(c). That case is listed below, I do not know if it would help or apply in your case, but it's the only decision i saw limiting the guideline provision. However the sentencing guidelines are no longer mandatory, unless the crime was committed before 2005. The supreme court did however hold that the guideline range must be considered by the trial judge and if there are errors in determining the correct guideline range, the court can not give true consideration to the guidelines because they were wrongly calculated, thus an appeal could result in a order for resentencing, however the same sentence could generally be imposed, as the court has then considered the guidelines but determines for some reason they you warrant a more severe penalty than is recommended.


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS DEGOVANNI No. 96-1333
January 2, 1997
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Criminal No. 95-00092-2)
GARTH, Circuit Judge :
In the context of U.S.S.G. §3B1.1(c) which authorizes an enhancement of two levels when a defendant is characterized as a "supervisor", the question we must answer in this appeal is: when is a supervisor not a supervisor? In the instant case, we hold that one is only a "supervisor" under U.S.S.G. §3B1.1(c) when he is so involved in, and connected to, the illegal activity of others that he actually supervises their illegal conduct, and is not just a supervisor by virtue of his de jure position in the police department hierarchy.


 

 

jamest and 3 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related Criminal Law Questions