You'll have to try to vacate the judgment based on legal excuse, if there are grounds to do so. In order to vacate a judgment, the defendant must make an application to the court that rendered the judgment. What is meant by legal excuse is that you had some extenuating circumstance that stopped you from appearing - failure of proper service, sickness, death in family etc., and you must show that you have a legally viable defense to the action (i.e., you don't owe the debt for some reason). Even if you don't have a good reason for missing the court date, I'd apply anyway...the court will probably show leniency.
An application to vacate a judgment is made by a procedure known as an “Order to Show Cause”. The order to show cause must contain the legal grounds upon which the defendant seeks to vacate the judgment, and an affidavit (sworn statement) from the defendant that provides the necessary facts to support the defendant’s application. If the order to show cause is prepared by an attorney, it will also contain the legal arguments in support of the request to vacate the judgment.
The order to show cause is presented to a judge who will direct the manner in which the papers are to be served on the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s attorney. Usually, this will be done by certified mail or overnight delivery. The judge will also determine the “return date” of the order to show cause, that is, the date by which the plaintiff must file its reply to the defendant’s request. Certain courts and judges require that the parties appear in court on the return date.
After reviewing the papers submitted, and possibly hearing testimony , the court will make a decision. If the court determines that the summons was not served properly, then the case will be dismissed. The plaintiff would then have to commence a new lawsuit. However, if the statute of limitations had expired during the time that the case was pending, the defendant could raise the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense and successfully defend a new lawsuit. Alternatively, if the court determines that service was proper, but that the defendant did not actually receive the summons, and has a meritorious defense, the defendant will be permitted to serve an answer and defend the action.
I believe this answers your question. However, if you need clarification or have follow-up questions regarding this matter, I will be happy to continue our conversation – simply reply to this answer. If you are otherwise satisfied with my response, please leave a positive rating as it is the only way I am able to get credit for my answers. Thank you, ***** ***** wish you all the best with this matter.