How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Lucy, Esq. Your Own Question

Lucy, Esq.
Lucy, Esq., Lawyer
Category: Consumer Protection Law
Satisfied Customers: 23665
Experience:  Lawyer
Type Your Consumer Protection Law Question Here...
Lucy, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

In 2010, I filed 29 disputes for charges totalling $145,072.70

Resolved Question:

In 2010, I filed 29 disputes for charges totalling $145,072.70 on my MC. The disputes were all for no credit for merchandise returned.Through the banks' arbitrations using documentation supplied by the merchant and me, I was credited $113,237.45 of the $145,072.70. The merchant rebilled my MC for $52,360.75. I cannot find anyone who can/will tell me if this is a legal practice.
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Consumer Protection Law
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.

My name is XXXXX XXXXX I'd be happy to answer your questions today. I'm sorry to hear that this happened.

When a customer requests a charge back on merchandise paid, the merchant's recourse if he believes that he is owed the money is to sue for breach of contract. He should not run a new charge that was never authorized by the consumer. If that happens, the consumer can again request a charge back from the credit card company. However, if the merchant is owed the money, he could go to court and sue. It's not considered fraud unless the merchant knows he is not entitled to the money and runs the charge, anyway.

If the credit card company cannot determine whether the charge was authorized, then the consumer's recourse is to sue for the amounts that were charged without permission.

You are not required to sign a settlement that you do not agree with. The client ultimately has the final say on whether to settle a case.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

The merchant could not provide accurate accounting indicating where the money kept from my returns had been applied. When the contradictions were pointed out during the dispute(s) process, arbitration decided in my favor for the amount mentioned above. Same situation for 2 additional credit cards involved; just not as much money, but significant amounts. Staying with just the one MC, my credit limit was exceeded by $100,000 at one point. I never received one phone call and don't understand why my card was not declined - as it should have been. The bank that owns the MC told me that for customers with excellent credit they will allow extreme credit limit overages. That has NEVER been my experience in the past. I did not recognize that I had been re-billed by the merchant and did not understand if it is or is not allowed. The VISA/MC merchant guidelines states that transactions must be handled a certain way; regardless of whether the merchant is "owed" money. The merchant's lack of proper bookkeeping and accounting is the reason they lost the disputes. That is not my fault and it has taken 3 yrs of my life trying to resolve this case b/c of their egregious and "questionable" accounting. Counsel for the merchant sent me a letter for the $86,000 I was credited from arbitration. What is the point of agreeing to abide by arbitration decisions if the merchant can still sue me for money I was credited - whether I have the merchandise or not. Also, I have no way of finding out if the CC company stated I authorized the charges. They would have to say I did b/c they put them through. Also, what about the statute of limitations? Isn't it too late for me to sue them? I would like to add that although I have no intention of reporting to the bar or telling my lawyer about these inquiries (if she would answer them I wouldn't have to be asking you), I did not think it was in my best interest to go into a meeting without first discussing with me what she was planning to say. Much less state that I did owe the merchant money (by her calculations), just not as much as they claimed. Is that standard procedure to provide the proof of your client's alleged obligation? Shouldn't that be the accuser's burden?

Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
The statute of limitations in Georgia is four years for oral contracts or six for written. Either way, your right to sue would arise when the charges were billed for the second time, so that's when the statute of limitations begins to run. It isn't when the original agreement was made.

In court, the person who is making the claim (usually the plaintiff, except with counterclaims) has the burden of proving the allegations. However, the Rules of Discovery were designed so that one party cannot hide information from the other. A party is legally required to produce information to the other party under these rules. That means that you may have to give them information, but you can also request information about their accounting procedures and practices.

To submit the charge, they necessarily have to say that you authorized it. That either means giving a signed receipt with your signature or the CVV code.

If they agreed to binding arbitration, and then sued, the other party would have the ability to move to dismiss on the basis that the issue had already been resolved in binding arbitration.

Lucy, Esq., Lawyer
Satisfied Customers: 23665
Experience: Lawyer
Lucy, Esq. and other Consumer Protection Law Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Previous | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

Meet The Experts:

  • Infolawyer


    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed attorney helping individuals and businesses.
< Last | Next >
  • Infolawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed attorney helping individuals and businesses.
  • Ely's Avatar


    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
  • Tina's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    17 years legal experience including consumer protection law.
  • Barrister's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Attorney with 15 years experience in various consumer protection areas
  • P. Simmons's Avatar

    P. Simmons


    Satisfied Customers:

    16+ yrs. of legal experience.
  • Andrea, Esq.'s Avatar

    Andrea, Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    25 yrs. of experience in employment law, real estate and business law, family law, criminal defense and immigration.
  • LADY LAWYER's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Consumer Lawyer