Consumer Protection Law
Consumer Protection Law Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
This question is clear. I want case law which supports a finding of dismissal of this Motion for Summary Judgment because BB&T did negative things that caused me to default. It is like getting somebody fired so they can't pay rent and then evicting them for failure to pay.
The bank president, I believe did a retaliatory on me because I had been involved in a disagreement with a family member at the Kroger's.
He knew me. I didn't really know him, but I saw him periodically.
I want case law that supports a denial of this Petition for Summary Judgment based on his actions to cause me financial harm.
If you do not know the answer; get off the question and allow another expert to answer.
I don't have time for you to continue to ask for clarification.
It is a defendable motion and I want the defense for it. Do you know the answer? Yes or no. If yes send it. If no, release my money and allow another expert. What is your name?
Hi, and Welcome to JustAnswer, My name isXXXXX am a licensed, practicing Attorney, but I need certain information from you,
A motion for summary judgment can only be granted where there is no genuine issue of material fact, making a trial unnecessary.
Your argument that the lender's actions caused you to default on the mortgage and the other arguments contained in your Replies are not enough to defeat the bank's Motion for Summary Judgment. Your arguments are issues properly raised at trial, not at the hearing on this particular Motion. In order to defeat the bank's motion, you must refute the specific grounds on which the lender is basing his right to summary judgment. Therefore, I have to ask you the following and also ask that you number your answers to correspond with the questions,
1. In which State do you reside ?
2. Did the bank meet its obligation to satisfy the procedural requirement of setting forth the grounds for summary judgment in the written motion itself ?
3. Did your answer to the bank's Complaint in Mortgage Foreclosure contain any affirmative defenses, and if so, did the bank disprove those affirmative defenses in the written motion itself ? (It is not enough for a lender to attempt to disprove these affirmative defenses at the hearing on its Motion; in addition, the bank must explain in the written motion itself the reasons why the borrower's affirmative defenses are not enough to preclude summary judgment. If the bank fails to do so, their request for summary judgment must be denied;
4. Did the bank have standing to institute this foreclosure action ? If the bank is not the original lender, it must prove that the assignment of the note and mortgage to the bank and to any predecessor, was proper.
Please answer questions 2, 3, and 4 in my previous Information Request,
Regarding Number 2, please state the grounds which the bank has in its written motion, as its basis for this Motion for Summary Judgment,
The grounds are extremely important because that is the only way that the Court will deny their motion. As I stated previously, your arguments are excellent, however, they should be argued at trial. They will not defeat the bank's motion.
In order to defeat the bank's motion, you have to refute each ground that it states as its basis for its motion
No, you are not going to lose your house, if you just follow the thinking and the steps which I have outlined below.
1. I know I am repeating myself with this, but it is of the utmost importance, so it bears repeating. In a Motion for Summary Judgment, the Movant (Party filing the Motion) is telling the Judge, "Look, Judge, there is no need to waste time having a whole trial; take a look here and you will see that there is no genuine issue of material fact, so just grant us our Motion for Summary Judgment and we'll call it a day and be on our way;
You - ""Judge, there are issues here, we have a difference of opinion and the issues are very material and must be heard by you at trial. They should not be decided here by this Motion."
Then you refute each of their allegations in the written motion, For Example -
"Bank claims I did not try to mitigate my damages." This is a genuine issue of fact and is certainly material to the case. This is not an issue which can, or should be decided in a Motion for Summary Judgment. I made every attempt to mitigate my damages by:
A. I attempted to pay the interest on _____, and on ______, and on ________; each time I attmepted to pay, the bank refused payment. They cannot first refuse my payment so many times, then come here and argue that I made no attempt. Your Honor, that is a total fabrication and a serious misrepresentation in their attempt to mislead the Court;
B. On _________ , I told Mr, ________ tat I wanted to participate in the Home Affordable Program (Hamp) (Or, if you asked for refinancing, the Home Affordable Refinancing Program - HARP). I asked for an application several times and I was refused. Your Honor, the Federal Government has paid billions of dollars to banks as an incentive to help homeowners like me be able to participate in one of these Programs that were introduced by President Obama. Yet, the bank refused all of my requests. They cannot deny me access to these Programs, allow me to go into default, then come here and tell the Court that I made no attempt to mitigate my damages. This, too, is another fabrication on their part, calculated to misrepresent the facts and mislead the Court. This is very material to the case and presents a genuine issue of fact which your Honor can decide only at trial, and after hearing all the facts and reviewing all the evidence I will present, not here by way of the plaintiff's Motion just to save itself time and take my home of 38 years;
Although the Memorandum of Law in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment is important, from your standpoint, in order to defeat their Motion and have the Judge deny their Motion, you must take each allegation in the bank's written motion and refute it in the same way that I did in A. and B., above. You are showing the Judge that, contrary to the allegations in the bank's motion that there are no issues, you must argue that there are many issues here and a Motion for Summary Judgment is not the proper forum to decide these issues.
If the bank attempts to argue a point which it has not included in its written motion, you must immediately object, like this,
"Objection, your Honor. This issue was not included in the plaintiff's written motion, I had no notice of this, and, therefore, I was not given the opportunity to prepare a counterargument, and the plaintiff should not be permitted to raise that at this time"
Then, you can mention that you had made an agreement with Mr. ________ of the ______________ Department so that your accounts would have enough funds to make your monthly mortgage payments.
"Then, Mr. ___________ , the president of the bank, rescinded this agreement without my knowledge or consent and without giving me prior notice and morved my funds to another account, depleting the funds which I was using to make my monthly mortgage payments and caused the default. . This had a domino effect and it was downhill after that". Plaintiff cannot rearrange and redistribute a customer's funds so that the customer cannot make his monthly mortgage payments, set the stage for the customer's default, then tell the customer, 'Oh, well, you defaulted, so we're foreclosing.' There are so many issues which are material to this case, your Honor, that it would be a serious miscarriage of justice, I would be extremely prejudiced, I would suffer irreparable harm, if the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment were granted, whereas, the plaintiff will not, in any way, be prejudiced by going to trial and having your Honor decide the issues"
Just remember to refute all additional grounds which the plaintiff has alleged in the written motion and keep repeating that this is yet another Genuine issue which is very much material to the case and cannot and should not be decided by a Motion for Summary Judgment
Do you get the general idea ? Just take it point by point, object where it is necessary to object, and stress, "extreme prejudice to you" , "irreparable harm to you ", "No prejudice to the plaintiff",
I hope I was able to give you a better understanding on how to defeat a Motion for Summary Judgment,
Please be kind enough to rate my service to you as "Excellent Service",
Bonus and Positive Feedback are greatly appreciated,
Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to assist you,
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).