Consumer Protection Law
Consumer Protection Law Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
I ordered a real estate course from the organisation of Dean Graziosi- He advertises profusely on TV His e-site is deangraziosi.com . He operates through a Corporation by the name of PMI EDU Center LCC located in Lehi,UT 84043. The program I suscribed to is called DEAN INNER Circle.
the cost was $3275. I ordered the course on )08/07/2012.they have a cancellation policy of seven business days after enrollment. they provide mentoring as well as learning computer software. I was to meet with my mentor once a week over the telephone. Our "mentorship session" lasted from 5 to 15 minutes each time.
I subsequently attended an additional"free seminar" of Dean Graziosi at the beginning of October 2012 during which I understood that their modus operandi was to place in front of my eyes enticing cases of members such as myself who would achieve great resullts because the organisation would advise you and "hold your hand" on all critical aspects of a given RE transactions.
they offered different programs ranging form $10,000 to $25,000 or $30,000 to participate . I declined alll of their enticement.
In view of this experience,I went back home to cancel my ongoing relationship with them on 10/23/2012 and asked for a total refund of the $3275 I had invested with them. they refused stating that I had signed a contract for a 7 day refund.
I then called my credit card company mastercharge by Chase Bank and requested a credit for my charge. MasterCharge complied with my request and issued a total credit for the stated amount. Subsequently ( perhaps 30or 40 days later, Valerie Ingram customer service specialist of MC called me and said that PMI EDU CNTR refused the refund.
Upon my disapointment , she offered to call PMI and asked whether I was prepared to make a compromise. I mentioned that I would be prepared to let go $1000 of the total $3275 in view of the fact that I had "consumed " some of their services. She asked me to wait on the telephone while whe spoke with PMI about my proposal. She came back to me after 5 minutes stating that she would issue a credit to my account of $2275 of the total purchase of $3275.
I was satisfied with that oucome, until I receive la letter from MC stating that after contacting PMI, they refused my offer and sent about 25 pages of documents showing the contract I had signed. Valerie Ingram of MC thus informed me that credit would be taken away from me. I informed Valerie that I had considered my offer of $2275 instead of $3275 as accepted by PMI, and since they now reneged on it, I would now demand a full credit of $3275.
this is where we stand right now . What shall I do , contact again PMI or MC?
what is my leverage: filing reports with BBB in Utah, Contacting the State Attoney Generalof Utah, contacting the Federal Trade Commission?
I have been a cusotmer of Chase for over 40 years , in the same branch,showing that I am not a fly by night customer trying to get a refund.
I wonder whether the branch could have an influnce on MC. they are the same company but a different organisation within Chase.
If you require additional details, I will be glad to supply them to you.
Was not at all satisfied by your response for the following reasons.
1- You informed me that there are some options available to come to a resolution.
All of your options are based on legal approaches, and you started your memo by stating that a contract is inforceable once signed.
I am therefore not going to seek an attorney and incur furhter expenses , the amount in question is not substantail enough.
2- I was looking for practical advise to arrive at an informal resolution either with the service provider or with the MC/Chase, or with both.
3- I was looking for consumer protection from the FED regarding protecting consumer vis-a-vis vendors or credit card companies without resulting to costly litigation.
Ypou have not provided me with practical approches to back back to either party .
Still hopeful that you may come up with a practicla solution for me
I could not be more clear as to what I am seeking:
I am seeking a full credit for the $3000 I spent on the "course"
Now that you have established that the contract is legally binding
I am seeking another way to argue successfully with the MC or the vendor.
1- Which is a better target MC or vendor ?.
2-what is my leverage with either of both?
with MC I can argue that the company is constantly extracting more funds from it customers and that I stopoed the relationship because I didn't want to be caught in their net.MC's fresponsibility is to protect me as a csutomer of very long date.
with Vendor, I could bring our all of the negative publicity that would derive from my disconted. But they may argue that I am threatening them with bad publicity.
What to you suggest.do you have any approaches to suggest to me?
the Attorney general option is in my view nothing but another legal option.
the vendor has all the documentation to protect their case. they also have the multiple experience of dealing with cases similar to mine.
Awaiting your creative suggestions
I have opted out to allow other experts to assist you. Thank you again
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).