Certainly a non-compete contract is only between the company and employee who sign the contract. However, the purpose of such a contract is to prevent another business from gaining the past clients and services of the salon/employee who agreed to non-compete. You indicate that there was a lawsuit between the "old salon" (the one you say you only went to over 8 years ago only once) and the "new salon" (the one you currently go to). You indicate that the court judgment says that the new salon cannot see any clients from the past salon.
If the new salon has told you they cannot see you because of this judgment (which is what it seems you are saying) then it is not the other salon controlling or preventing a client such as you, but it may just be the new salon's way of avoiding any further litigation. Based on what you describe has been your salon experience it may be that the new salon can make a good case that the judgment may not apply to you, but whether they want to spend the time or money necessary to reach such an agreement with the old salon or go through court to fine tune who is or who is not a former client at the old salon is up to them. The effect may be that the new salon denies serving any person who may lead to future litigation, and a business can deny service to anyone. It may feel as if the non-compete contract is at fault, but it may just be a business decision due to the desire to avoid future litigation and the new salon's choice.
It may be possible for you to get more information to see if there is any clear definition of who is or is not considered a client of the old salon from your new salon. Normally court judgments or such settlements should provide clear definitions of who such a decision applies to. Also, sometimes employees in a business may not fully understand what they need to do to adhere to a court judgment or law, so you may want to see if the management or owners can help you better understand what they mean.
Thank you for the additional information.
As your added information indicates, there is a difference of opinion on who or what is meant by any contract term. That, sadly, is more common than it should be in contracts.
It seems from what you describe that the old salon B (to use your names) is claiming that a person who visited their salon B once, some eight years ago, and who has not returned since and has been a client of salon A well before the stylist who used to work for salon B started working for salon A still counts as a Salon B client. Certainly, as a consumer you may want to try to file your own suit for a declaratory judgment that indicates seeing a salon once does not make a person a client subject to the contract - but that would be at your cost, of course. It may also be possible for you to join a current action, such as the one for contempt, so you can speak at court as to your own situation. That, of course, will need to be discussed with salon A's attorney. Without the language used in the contract or in the court decisions, however, it is difficult to provide any other information.
That is a trickier question. A non-compete is contract between only two parties, and both of them freely enter into the agreement. That its effects will be felt by others is not the purpose of the agreement, so while you present a clear situation in which your personal interests are affected, that alone may not be enough to do away with a type of agreement which courts have routinely found fair and legal for general purposes. Other than the direct actions I explained above I am not aware of any consumer protection ways to work through such effects, for, if they existed then the value of such contracts would be weakened. You may, however, speak with your state's Bureau of Consumer Protection, here, to see if your state offers some specific consumer protection laws to assist.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).