Hello and thank you for allowing me the opportunity to assist you.
In a nutshell, what you’ve posted basically just means that Wells Fargo is acting on behalf of another entity/person that owns your mortgage.
Unfortunately, I can’t possibly provide any help with defenses if I don’t know your situation. The only information you’ve provided is the name of the plaintiff. Can you provide more information about what’s going on?
DISCLAIMER: Please be aware that only an attorney licensed in your state is authorized to advise you in legal matters, and that the limitations of this setting may prevent your legal issues from being thoroughly addressed. Accordingly, please understand that (1) by answering your question(s) I am not acting as your attorney, (2) my answer(s) should be construed as general information only, and (3) our discussion is not an adequate substitute for an in-person consultation with an attorney.
I think your letter is fine, though you should keep in mind that the creditor is not required to provide all of the information that you’re seeking. Of course, if you are sued, you can subpoena that information. Also, if you are sued and contest the matter, then the creditor will have to prove that it has standing to sue by somehow showing that it has been lawfully assigned the debt. In your case, you can ask for evidence that Wells Fargo is actually lawfully allowed to act on behalf of the other entity.
You also asked if the creditor has the original note. A lot of people are trying the “produce the note” defense, but you should keep in mind that the original note is not required. The judge can rule in favor of the creditor if the note is lost but the creditor has convincing evidence as to the note’s contents (this can be done with a copy of the note). The judge will simply rule that the creditor must indemnify you if another creditor with the original note comes forward for payment at a later time. The “produce the note” defense is helpful if the neither the note nor a copy can be produced, and the contents cannot be proved.
Bear in mind that you may also be able to save your house with a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, depending on your situation. That is especially helpful if your house is worth less than your mortgage, and you have more than one mortgage. In some cases the bankruptcy court can literally strip away the other mortgages. Also, a Chapter 13 will allow you to repay arrears over a period of 3 to 5 years rather than immediately.
Have I satisfactorily addressed your concerns? If not, then please feel free to ask for clarification.
Allowing creditors to enforce lost notes is not giving them a break, nor is it a change in the law. The law already specifically allows creditors to enforce lost notes:
§ 3-309. ENFORCEMENT OF LOST, DESTROYED, OR STOLEN INSTRUMENT.
(a) A person not in possession of an instrument is entitled to enforce the instrument if:
(1) the person seeking to enforce the instrument
(A) was entitled to enforce it the instrument when loss of possession occurred, or
(B) has directly or indirectly acquired ownership of the instrument from a person who was entitled to enforce the instrument when loss of possession occurred;
(2) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the person or a lawful seizure; and
(3) the person cannot reasonably obtain possession of the instrument because the instrument was destroyed, its whereabouts cannot be determined, or it is in the wrongful possession of an unknown person or a person that cannot be found or is not amenable to service of process.
(b) A person seeking enforcement of an instrument under subsection (a) must prove the terms of the instrument and the person's right to enforce the instrument. If that proof is made, Section 3-308 applies to the case as if the person seeking enforcement had produced the instrument. The court may not enter judgment in favor of the person seeking enforcement unless it finds that the person required to pay the instrument is adequately protected against loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the instrument. Adequate protection may be provided by any reasonable means.
The only issue is that the creditor who is enforcing the lost note must provide adequate protection against a future claim for the same note. Judges do that by ordering the creditor to indemnify the debtor against such claims.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).