How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Law.Hut Your Own Question
Law.Hut, Lawyer
Category: Canada Law
Satisfied Customers: 7846
Experience:  with over 15 years experience.
Type Your Canada Law Question Here...
Law.Hut is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

The person in the case is the victim (main witness). On the

This answer was rated:

The person in the case is the victim (main witness). On the KGB the person states they were not involved with or seeing somebody for a certain time. Then in a declaration which was done a couple of months later. (After the fact the accused was interrogated). The person is now saying they did see and was with that somebody for the time in question. Does that hurt the credibility of the victim?

If the victim has given contradictory statements about a significant fact (and not something trivial or that could be easily mistaken or forgotten), then yes, that can damage the credibility of that person. The trier of fact (whether a usage or a jury) would be entitled to put less or no weight on the evidence of that person, if they have doubts about their credibility overall.
Law.Hut and other Canada Law Specialists are ready to help you