CA Real Estate
California Real Estate Law Questions? Get Answers Online Now.
Good morning,I'm Doug, and I'm sorry to hear of the confusion. My goal is to provide you with excellent service today.
The Motion you refer to is actually a CCP section 170.6 motion and along with the Motion for Peremptory Challenge you do need to also submit a declaration or Affidavit in substantially the same form as is found in CCP section 170.6 (a)(6) of the code, as seen here:
Here is some additional information which, while posted by the Sacramento Law Library, applies statewide:
You may reply back to me using the Reply link and I will be happy to continue to assist you until I am able to address your concerns, to your satisfaction.I hope that I have been able to fully answer your question. As I am not an employee of JustAnswer, please be so kind as to rate my service to you. That is the only way I am compensated for assisting you. Thank you in advance.I wish you and yours the best in 2016,Doug
This seems like a very crucial matter for you, and your questions and issues suggest that an in-depth conversation might best suit your needs. If you are interested, for a very nominal charge I can offer you a private phone conference as opposed to continuing in this question and answer thread which is searchable and viewable by the public.Please know that I answered your question in good faith, providing you with the information that you asked for, and I did that with the expectation that you would act likewise and rate my service to you. If I have already provided you with the information you asked for and you have no additional questions, would you please now rate my service to you so I can be compensated for assisting you?Thanks in advance,Doug
I am unable to further assist you in this matter, and I am going to opt out of your question and open this up for other professionals.Your question is being placed back in the question list for other professionals to see, and to respond to. You do not have to stay online for the question to be active. Should another professional pick it up, you should be alerted by email unless you actively disable this feature.There is no need for you to reply at this time as this may "lock" your question back to me, thus inadvertently delaying other professionals' access to it.I apologize for any inconvenience and wish you well in your future.Doug
Welcome to Just Answer! My name is Maverick. Please give me a few minutes to review, analyze and/or research your inquiry and I will be back. Thank you for your patience.
The 170.1 statute that you refer to states in part:
(iii) A person aware of the facts might reasonably entertain a doubt that the judge would be able to be impartial.
Anytime that you have to prove up facts it is always a good idea to back your motion up with an affidavit or declaration that sets forth the facts that would support the motion. In the alternative, those facts would have to be established by testimony at the disqualification hearing. I know that 170.6 spell this out but for some reason 170.1 does not.
Please state what other questions you have.
Please Note: (1) Just Answer’s site disclaimers apply to all levels of service; (2) Most follow-up questions are answered with in the hour; however, if I am not signed on, please allow up to 24 hours; and (3) If we are done, please assign a feedback rating so Just Answer will compensate me for your question. Thank you for using Just Answer.