How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Patrick, Esq. Your Own Question
Patrick, Esq.
Patrick, Esq., Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 10911
Experience:  Significant experience in all areas of employment law.
Type Your California Employment Law Question Here...
Patrick, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I work for a community hospital that is privately owned. Recently

This answer was rated:

I work for a community hospital that is privately owned. Recently it has come to light that it is hospital policy to "change" the time card values in order to comply with state regs. ie, you did not clock out for lunch during an 8 hour period because you did not have a lunch. Before you are paid the "Timekeeper" adds the deducted time onto your timecard without notifying the employee of the change. Also I am a per diem employee with no benefits since my date of hire last year. However, I work 40+ hours weekly. Can they continue to deny me benefits or at some point do they need to make me a full time benefitted employee if I am doing the same job as the person next to me for the same hours
Good afternoon and thank you for entrusting me to answer your question. I will do everything I can to assist you.

Before I provide an answer I'd like to clarify my understanding of the facts. Are you saying that your employer is deducting hours from your timecard when you fail to clock out on your lunches? Are you working through lunch? Are you inquiring as to whether you are entitled to be paid for your lunch time?

I very much look forward to helping you on this matter.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

Yes, it is currently hospital practice to clock employees out or deduct time for lunches that have not been taken prior to submitting the time for our paychecks. I found this out while reviewing my paycheck and noticing that I had not been paid for hours that I worked. I was told that it is policy to deduct the 30 minutes prior to submitting the time. I am guessing they do this hospital wide. Is this legal? Can they change my timecard without my permission.


Also there is the question about my being non-benefitted yet working a 40+ hour week.



Thank you very much for your reply. Has your employer made it clear that you are supposed to be taking a lunch and are you disregarding that directive? If so, is it because you are being encouraged or pressured to disregard the official lunch policy? If you are being encouraged or pressured, what specifically is your employer doing to accomplish that?

Sorry to be asking such specific questions, but the CA Supreme Court recently addressed this issue and the law, as it presently stands, is fairly nuanced on this point.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

Yes, I should be taking a lunch but there is often not time to do so during my day. I didn't ask to be paid "Overtime" just the 30 minute time that I worked. I am directed to take my lunch but there isn't time during my day and I chose to work through this 30 minute time period so that I can leave on time.

Thank you very much for your clarification.

Federal and state law require employers to pay employees for all time the employees are "suffered or permitted to work." An employee need not work with express permission in order to be entitled to pay. If they are working with the employers knowledge, as appears to be the case in your circumstance, they are entitled to be paid because they are working with implied permission.

Prior to the CA Supreme Court's recent ruling in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, an employer in this circumstance would not only be liable to pay hourly wages to employees who work through lunch, they also would have been penalized for not "providing" lunch. However, the Brinker decision made clear that an employer satisfies its obligation to "provide" a lunch simply by making lunch time available. The employer has no obligation to "ensure" the employee actually uses that time to eat lunch.

The Brinker decision noted, you seem not to be concerned with obtaining penalties for your employer's failure to provide a lunch and concerned primarily with simply being paid your hourly wage for that time. You would be entitled to that, and the Brinker decision does not affect you in this respect. Your employer cannot deduct from your paycheck for work you performed during your lunch provided such work was performed with the knowledge of the employer.

Your recourse in this circumstance would be either to sue in civil court for unpaid wages (you'd be entitled to attorney fees if you prevailed) or to file a wage claim with the DLSE, which most claimants pursue without the assistance of an attorney at all.

To file a wage claim with the DLSE, visit this link:

With regard to receiving benefits, your employer is under no obligation to provide them to you, even if they are providing benefits to other similarly situated employees, unless you can demonstrate a discriminatory basis for the denial. "Discrimination" occurs if the basis relates to your race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age (over 40), or sexual orientation. Unless you can connect the denial of benefits to one of these "protected traits" and do so by a preponderance of the evidence (the legal standard for a plaintiff to prevail in civil court), you would have no legal recourse on this issue.

Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding the above and I will be more than happy to assist you further.

If you do not require any further assistance, please be so kind as to provide a positive rating of my service so that I may receive credit for assisting you. Very best wishes to you and thank you so much for coming to Just Answer.
Patrick, Esq., Lawyer
Satisfied Customers: 10911
Experience: Significant experience in all areas of employment law.
Patrick, Esq. and other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Previous | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

Meet The Experts:

  • LawTalk



    Satisfied Customers:

    I have 30 years of experience in the practice of law, including employment law and discrimination law.
< Last | Next >
  • LawTalk's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I have 30 years of experience in the practice of law, including employment law and discrimination law.
  • Tina's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, 17 years experience & recognized by ABA for excellence in employment law.
  • Brandon, Esq.'s Avatar

    Brandon, Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Has received a certificate of recognition from the California State Senate for his outstanding legal service.
  • melissamesq's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Represent clients to maximum recovery in employment cases.
  • /img/opt/shirt.png Attorney2020's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I have significant experience in employment law.
  • /img/opt/shirt.png Legal Counsel's Avatar

    Legal Counsel


    Satisfied Customers:

    California Licensed Attorney- 29 years- Wages, Hours, Overtime, Discrimination, Wrongful Termination.

Related California Employment Law Questions