How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Joseph Your Own Question
Joseph, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 5299
Experience:  Extensive experience representing employees and management
Type Your California Employment Law Question Here...
Joseph is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I signed a Work Order as a trainer, “Contractor liable for

This answer was rated:

I signed a Work Order as a trainer, “Contractor liable for lost class revenue, if he cancels with less than 15 days notice, or no shows, and suitable replacement instructor cannot be secured by CUSTOMER." I had been working on a computer training assignment for the District Attorneys office at the Department of Justice for a few months. I had a conflict with the last two days in the afternoon but offered to work the mornings. I also suggested someone local they could use to replace me in the afternoon. I was a local trainer in SF and they decided to send a trainer from Louisiana to San Francisco. The training company, LanTec that I contracted for deducted $770 from my paycheck to cover hotel, airfare, parking, and other travel expenses for the person who they replaced me with. I did not agree to that. The training company was paid in full by the Department of Justice for the training that the other trainer did. The other trainer was an employee of the training company. I don't see how they can charge me for expenses incurred by another trainer and deduct it from my pay.

Hello and welcome to JustAnswer.


I'm sorry to hear about your situation and hope I can help.


That definitely seems completely unfair and likely constitutes a breach of your contract. When 'suitable' is used in this sense in the contract, it would mean someone with the approximate level of skills and abilities as you have who is capable of performing the job in approximately the same manner.


Since it was your responsibility to find a replacement, it would be your contractor's responsibility to prove that the replacement you found and suggested was somehow unsuitable for the position. I find it hard that they couldn't find someone in the entire Bay Area (or at least California) who could fill in for you too and that they 'needed' to send someone from Lousiana.


Your legal recourse would be to sue in small claims court (Although any cost that you would have incurred in finding a replacement would likely be deducted from that recovery).


However, suing your contractor would likely mean that they would not look to use your services in the future, so despite the money being unfairly deducted from your pay, you may want to let it go if you plan on working for this contractor in the future.


If you don't plan on having any future working relationship with them then you should sue in small claims court, but otherwise, the future cost definitely outweighs the benefits of suing in court.

Joseph and other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related California Employment Law Questions