California Employment Law
Have California Employment Law Questions? Ask a Lawyer.
Is it legal in California for an employer to hold your paycheck for 90 days after you quit? I worked on 100 percent commission and was paid three times a month and gave one day notice (not a business day). Draw against commission checks on the 15th and the 30th and a commission check on the 25th. I quit December 22 of last month. My last check was a draw check on the 15th of December. I just called my ex employers office and the lady who writes the checks said that my boss has 90 days to pay me. And that when she previously quit it took her 90 days to get paid too. (she started working for the company again). The company is small and there is no one above my boss (owner)
But does the law apply to employees who are paid 100% commission rather than regular wages? Also I didn't leave a 72 hour notice. I quit saturday the 22nd and said I would not be returning to work that monday the 23rd. (its a m-f workday) Lastly, she has been paying per the contract our commission checks on the 25th of the following month, whether the customer has paid for that order or not. She deducts pay after 90 days if the customers invoice is still unpaid. So my fear would be that she if I told her to pay me right now for Decembers orders she would out of retaliation only pay for orders/invoices that have received payment at this point. Please reply. thank you.
Emily,Thank you very much for your reply.The Labor Code specifically defines "wages" to include commissions, and Labor Code section 201 and 203 apply to employees who work solely on a commission basis.One wrinkle to this analysis for commission employees is that an employer is typically free to determine when a commission "vests" for the purpose of it becoming a wage. Most often, employers will require that they actually receive payment from a customer on a sale before the commission vests and the employee is entitled to payment. The rationale for this is that if the customer does not pay, the employer should not be made to pay the employee commission on a sale that never really went through.There need not be a written agreement to the effect that commissions only vest once payment is received--if it is the employer's general practice not to pay commissions until payment has been received, that is generally sufficient to delay the employer's legal obligation to pay commissions until that time. It is important to note that this means that you'd still be entitled to the commissions and still be entitled to a penalty assessment pursuant to section 203, but just not until the payment is received.The other wrinkle is that if other employees had to step in and complete a substantial amount of work for the sales to go through following your departure, an individual in your circumstance may not be entitled to the commissions because they weren't "earned" by you.Courts determine whether a commission was "earned" by a particular employee by examining whether that employee was the "procuring cause" of the sale.In Brea v. McGlashan, 3 Cal. App. 2d 454 [39 P.2d 877], the court, in determining whether a finding that the plaintiff was the procuring cause of obtaining certain advertising contracts was sustained by the evidence, said: "The word 'procure' does not necessarily imply the formal consummation of an agreement. ... In its broadest sense, the word means to prevail upon, induce or persuade a person to do something. ... The originating cause, which ultimately led to the conclusion of the transaction, is held to be the procuring cause."Assuming that you were the procuring cause of the sales on which you now claim commissions, and assuming that it is not your employer's general practice to pay commissions until payment is received, you would be entitled to these commissions as "wages earned" starting 72 hours after you quit, since you didn't give advance notice, and penalty assessments for the non-payment of these commissions would begin accruing at that point in time. If you were not the procuring cause, you would not be entitled to the commissions, and if your former company has not yet been paid on the sales and their practice was to refrain from paying commissiosn until that time, you would be entitled to the commissions upon receipt of payment by your former company.Again, I sincerely XXXXX XXXXX this information helps you and I wish you the best. If I have answered your question, I would be very grateful for a positive rating of my service so that I may receive credit for assisting you. Kindest regards.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).