How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Patrick, Esq. Your Own Question
Patrick, Esq.
Patrick, Esq., Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 10901
Experience:  Significant experience in all areas of employment law.
Type Your California Employment Law Question Here...
Patrick, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I work in the State of California. I asked my employer to lay

This answer was rated:

I work in the State of California. I asked my employer to lay me off at a date convenient for her. I was a temporary worker with no guarantee or offer of extended employment or permanent employment. In an e-mail, she agreed to lay me off, and she agreed to not challenge my application for unemployment insurance benefits. Based on these agreements in an e-mail, after my employment ended, I filed for unemployment insurance as "laid off." On my last day of work, I blew the whistle (about unethical issues I witnessed under her watch) to her superiors. Well, I imagine she was quite upset about that, so she contested my application for UI, and now the EDD is saying that I committed fraud. I have filed an appeal based on the proof shown in the emails (which I provided to the EDD), but I want to know -- is it illegal for an employer to mislead and promise an employee to lay him or her off but then later claim the employee voluntarily left? Is the email documentation enough proof so that it can be considered as promissory estoppel? Am I at risk of going to jail or paying a huge fine? Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions.
Hello and thank you for entrusting me to assist you. I am so sorry to hear about the difficult situation you now find yourself faced with.

What the EDD will be concerned with are the actual circumstances of an employee's departure--not merely how the employer and employee superficially agreed to characterize it. Furthermore, the EDD is not concerned with how employment "would have" ended, but rather with how it actually ended. This means that even when an employee knows they are going to be fired or eventually laid off, if he or she prematurely quits, that is how the separation of employment will be determined.

In accordance with the above, the EDD will not give any weight to the agreement you may have entered into with your employer to lay you off on a particular date. The reality is that you were the moving party with regard to your separation of employment, and where an employee is the moving party, they will typically be ineligible for benefits.

This unfortunately remains true even if the employee's termination in the near future is inevitable. The EDD has gone so far as to find in some cases that, even where an employee is fired but asked to finish out the week, that he or she forfeits the right to collect UI benefits if he or she quits even a day before the scheduled final day.

Since the EDD is concerned with who was the moving party, the agreement you entered into with your former employer not to contest your benefits would be irrelevant. In order to prevail on your claim for UI benefits, you would have to show that you were forced out of your position, on the date you left, against your will.

Of course, none of this is to say that you committed some sort of intentional fraud by describing your separation of employment to the EDD as a "layoff." With regard to pursuing claims of fraud, it would typically need to be shown that you engaged in a willful and intentional deception. Your claim to have been "laid off," though technically inaccurate, is more a result of a misunderstanding about what constitutes a layoff rather than an attempt to intentionally deceive. This fact should be reiterated to the EDD.

Only in the most egregious cases do individuals accused of UI fraud actually go to jail. Here, the mistake was quite innocent. If you received benefits under this false pretense of being "laid off," you will have to pay them back, and if the EDD believes that you attempted to perpetrate an intentional deception, you may be asked to pay a penalty assessment, but even this is far from certain.

Beyond this, the EDD would need to refer the matter to the District Attorney, who could then choose to prosecute or decline to press charges. As noted, it would be almost unfathomable that any sort of criminal charge could result on the basis of the facts described.

I sincerely XXXXX XXXXX this information helps you and I wish you the best.

If you do not have any further concerns, I would be very grateful if you would give my answer a positive rating and click submit, as this is the only way I will receive credit for assisting you. If you have any additional concerns that you would like me to address, please feel free to let me know by hitting the REPLY or CONTINUE CONVERSATION button and I will be more than happy to continue assisting you.

Finally, please bear in mind that none of the above constitutes legal advice nor is any attorney client relationship created between us.

Thank you and very kindest regards.
Patrick, Esq., Lawyer
Satisfied Customers: 10901
Experience: Significant experience in all areas of employment law.
Patrick, Esq. and other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

Thank you for this very informative information. I really appreciate it. It's really unfortunate how this all turned out, and with the email agreement I had with my former employer to lay me off, I had absolutely thought I was eligible to apply for UI based on those agreements. I understand I have the crap end of the stick Cry, so I will at least plead to the judge the truth -- that I did not intentionally deceive and apply for UI benefits because of the misunderstanding based on the email exchange. It's a good thing I did not use any UI money, so they can take it all back. Thank you again, for your help!

Thank you very much for your positive rating and bonus. I wish you the very best moving forward.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Previous | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

Meet The Experts:

  • LawTalk



    Satisfied Customers:

    I have 30 years of experience in the practice of law, including employment law and discrimination law.
< Last | Next >
  • LawTalk's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I have 30 years of experience in the practice of law, including employment law and discrimination law.
  • Tina's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, 17 years experience & recognized by ABA for excellence in employment law.
  • Brandon, Esq.'s Avatar

    Brandon, Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Has received a certificate of recognition from the California State Senate for his outstanding legal service.
  • melissamesq's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Represent clients to maximum recovery in employment cases.
  • /img/opt/shirt.png Attorney2020's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I have significant experience in employment law.
  • /img/opt/shirt.png Legal Counsel's Avatar

    Legal Counsel


    Satisfied Customers:

    California Licensed Attorney- 29 years- Wages, Hours, Overtime, Discrimination, Wrongful Termination.

Related California Employment Law Questions