regarding the exception to at will emplyment under good faith and fair dealing exception: My performance was stellar as shown by performance reviews. This week VP appointed a new 2nd level manager over my manager. He had one on one with me Thursday saying he will insist on my making changes. Persons who left the company know how crude he is. He was crude to us. I complained to VP and CEO about many detailed complaints in email and asked for reassignment. He said this wont be allowed, there are no other openings he would not address my complaints that the guy was crude. I responded in email and copied CEO that I thought he was hypocritical expecting people to believe that he was the serious Christian he always wants to say he is and that this was double talk. I said he was lying for convenience and that God was watching his every move and that he knows very well that this guy is crude because many have complained and resigned. The next day without any discussion at all, HR said I was being terminated and walked me out the door. This appears to me to be termination based on malice. Do I have a case? If my employment aggreement said complaints can only be dealt with by arbitration, am I refused to use threats of a court case or jury trial in this case?
I lost 25% of my stock options which were to vest in 14 days as well as loss to all future value of the options on acquisition or going public. I also lost an enjoyable job and other employers are asking me to accept less pay. I was earning $135,000. Only 2 weeks severence was given
From Wikipedia: on at will under good faith and fair dealing which courts recognize in California:
This exception for a covenant of good faith and fair dealing represents the most significant departure from the traditional employment-at-will doctrine. Rather than narrowly prohibiting terminations based on public policy or an implied contract, this exception – at its broadest – reads a covenant of good faith and fair dealing into every employment relationship. It has been interpreted, by some courts, to mean either that employer personnel decisions are subject to a “just-cause” standard or that terminations made in bad faith or motivated by malice are prohibited
NOTICE: My goal here is to educate others about the law. I am always available to answer your follow-up questions after you click Accept – however, if you do not click Accept, the website gets paid, and I receive nothing. This is true, even if you are on a subscription plan. So please click Accept, so that I will be able to continue to provide this service for others in the future.
And, if you need to contact me again, please put my user id on the title line of your question (“To Socrateaser”), and the system will send me an alert. Thanks!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).