This situation, like most im sure, is rather complicated but I have created organized notes. It involves a new city ordinance regulating sober living homes (the possession of the license of which is very valuable to a legitimate business
model) and of course my lease. I am unfamiliar with JustAnswer's process in sending these docs along to you, and the cost for more specific advice based on them.
In short, my tenant who is a psychiatrist/ social worker and his physician wife, leased my property in their names as residents only (with no provision for operating a business), apparently to house patients/ clients for their behavioral health clinic. In the meanwhile the city passed an ordinance finally regulating the proliferation of profitable sober living homes, with the key element of reasonable spacing of these homes throughout the city on a first-come/ served basis. Landlord/ Property Owner's permission for operating such a home is required for the permit. Based on my desire to operate one of these homes myself at the lease term expiration, advice, no provision in the ordinance for a current landlord as myself and recognition by the city as they took my application that my house was leased currently, I applied and was granted permit #001 from the city. I did not feel I needed to inform my tenant of my actions regarding my property. On the last day of the filing period, my tenant's agent filed their own application, sans the required affidavit from the landlord, thereby notifying the city of their current unlawful operations at the property and of a conflict. The city of course cannot issue two permits for the same address, and has given me 30 days to take back control of my property so I can be issued the permit, or negotiate something with my tenant: like he allowing me to take over his operation (on the face) until term expiration, him immediately breaking the lease, etc or my license will be put back into circulation which surely would be permanently lost to me. In addition, fines and legal action will shortly begin to be imposed onto the tenant and me as landlord for such an unlawful operation and both of our credibilities in filing for this permit in the future would be jeopardized.
In meeting with him yesterday, despite stipulations that we act in goodfaith and in a spirit of cooperation to solve the crisis and that the aforementioned agent not be a party, this well-accredited doctor was hostile and acted greviously unethically. He not only demanded and badgered me that I absolutely recognize his agent and allow in the meeting, but deceptively got me to accept into this meeting his "HR Director" to explain to me how this agent was legitimately in his employ! Not until nearly the end of her traumatizing me even further on my DUTY to accept this agent (with still no discussion of the issue at hand with the city) and how my protests of this indicated my refusal to cooperate, did she reveal herself to be HIS ATTORNEY!! She refused to identify herself further. The meeting ended there with them demanding that 2 weeks from now was the earliest she would be able to study the ordinance and present viable options. I was so traumatized that I forgot about our 30 day deadline from the city. This meeting was agreed to be he and I and it ended up being 4 of them and me.
I somehow feel that his demand that this and future meetings be held only on his campus means that I was secretly recorded or otherwise studied for psychological weakness to their advantage, but I certainly feel I was traumatized and manipulated by a renown expert trained and currently practices
the healing from such psychological abuse. Despite my constant pleas throughout the meeting that I came in goodwill
and spirit of cooperation to resolve the crisis and in the best interest of his residents currently housed there, he ONLY continued to threaten to sue me for damaging his business model by denying him access to a permit (for which I would have to agree as landlord anyway).
I believe I was victimized on many levels, while still facing an unresolved crisis with the city and my lease. This is insane.
I believe the attorney (if in actuality), this psychiatrist/ social worker and his physician wife are held to higher, accountable standards of behaviour and ethics not only to their clients or patients, but to their professions and public. Not only by their licensing agencies, but also by their esteemed private organizations from which they hold valuable accreditations. Please help me Barrister