Ask a Business Lawyer. Get Business Law Questions Answered ASAP.
Thanks for your reply! I own a gym and have been developing this fitness product (design, testing, changes, etc) for 2 years. Obviously I have a lot already invested in getting the product to this point. It is also created for an industry that I am very familiar with. Our discussions to this point have been with the assumption that he will bring in capital, and will contribute in areas to be determined and outlined in our agreement. He also has partnership experience (is currently involved in 3 other partnerships).
I have two main concerns that I am looking to satisfy: 1) This product is one part of my business concept. I also have two other products that will be manufactured after this, as well as an entire fitness program designed around the implementation of these products. The partnership will only be for one of these products (as of now). Therefore, I don't know how to handle the possibility of the product being largely successful and at some point them wanting to sell. Would a clause defining an option to buy them out solve this?
2) I feel that the package deal of myself/experience/knowledge and the product are worth more than their capital investment of $30k. I'm not sure if this is ego or common sense (since this is all in theory at the moment).
Scott,Thank you for your follow-up. Please allow me to respond to each point that you raised below: 1) This product is one part of my business concept. I also have two other products that will be manufactured after this, as well as an entire fitness program designed around the implementation of these products. The partnership will only be for one of these products (as of now). Therefore, I don't know how to handle the possibility of the product being largely successful and at some point them wanting to sell. Would a clause defining an option to buy them out solve this?
There are a couple of issues here. Typically any product development within the partnership is owned by the partnership unless and until the parties agree to keep those assets out of the partnership via agreement. It also may be a potential fiduciary breach of duty violation by creating further products outside the partnership which can compete with the current business. Those concerns can be first resolved in writing so that the parties know what belongs within the partnership and what does not. As for a 'buy-out', that is likewise possible to enter into the terms. But from what you are describing you appear to be looking more for a limited partner or silent investor rather than equal partner, if what you are seeking is a buy-out in terms of success. Perhaps you may want to consider exactly what the relationship may be especially since from a legal perspective 'sweat' equity, 'skull' equity, management, or financial backing make no difference in terms of larger or small rights to a partnership, what governs instead is the percentage on which the partners themselves agreed upon.
You may be right as there is no rule of thumb here--what counts is what you and your partner both legitimately evaluate each of your investments to be. If you believe his investment is worth 30% or even 10% and he agrees, it is valid. But this is something you both would need to discuss together and between the both of you so as to find out the fairest split. Some inventors hold the lion's share of the ownership while others keep a minority share due to the excessive financial investment. This is really for you both to fairly evaluate.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).